I'm suspicious of all this, and words like, "...Remember, Hitler's rise to power was staged." "Nazi," and "Nazi Germany," were terms created by Jews, and circulated in the press to create hatred for Germany. "Nazi" is a play on words, to create a similar sentiment to "Stasi." No German EVER called themselves "Nazi."
Nothing I've read with respect to the truth about post-WWI Germany, or Hitler's rise to power, ever mentioned anything about his position being "staged." In fact, I've noted repeatedly on this messageboard that words like "Nazi" and "Hitler" are used to evoke a continued comparison and hatred for Germany. This hatred was a fabrication created by the cabal, who has controlled the press and allied governments for over a century.
I don't dispute the rest of the content, but the fact that these details I've mentioned are present makes me suspicious of the rest.
If you really want to understand comms and how much history is not what you'd think it is, then I'd start with this blog. It's a great place to begin digging, but try to keep an open mind. It can be a lot to take in and it make take several readings and doing your own research to really digest it.
OK. So I followed the link, prepared to spend some time absorbing new revelations about German history I'm not aware of, and the links in the posts would have me go to The Guardian and the BBC. Really? I don't have time for this.
If garbage is used for references, then everything that follows is...
I sent it just five minutes ago. You couldn't have done more than scan through it and have just decided to call it trash without giving it more than a 2 minute look.
Not sure what you mean by links to the Guardian and the BBC. If you mean the blog posts where it got some of it's clips from, many here do that. It's providing sauce. Many here do that.
A lot have found the Decode Blog very informative and intriguing. It's a very good resource.
If you don't have time to research and dig, then there's nothing anyone can do.
The only thing I directly disputed was the references I posted above with respect to Hitler and Germany. I said I don't dispute the rest of the content, only that it was suspect based upon the flawed premise. I followed the link you provided, and, right at the top, are links as "reference" to known liberal propaganda media sites. My main argument was what was claimed about Hitler and Germany. If you call this "sauce," then it's propaganda to support a flawed idea.
Nothing I've ever read has even SUGGESTED what you claim about Hitler and the Third Reich. Plus, using the term, "Nazi," is also flawed. I'm willing to entertain something new that I'm not aware of, but give me a better source than what was provided. I will invest quite a bit of time in learning something new, if it is compelling. See below.
Europa: The Last Battle is a good resource to start, and cites many additional resources in its content. This was twelve hours' worth, alone. Yes, I do have time, but choose to spend it wisely.
I'm suspicious of all this, and words like, "...Remember, Hitler's rise to power was staged." "Nazi," and "Nazi Germany," were terms created by Jews, and circulated in the press to create hatred for Germany. "Nazi" is a play on words, to create a similar sentiment to "Stasi." No German EVER called themselves "Nazi."
Nothing I've read with respect to the truth about post-WWI Germany, or Hitler's rise to power, ever mentioned anything about his position being "staged." In fact, I've noted repeatedly on this messageboard that words like "Nazi" and "Hitler" are used to evoke a continued comparison and hatred for Germany. This hatred was a fabrication created by the cabal, who has controlled the press and allied governments for over a century.
I don't dispute the rest of the content, but the fact that these details I've mentioned are present makes me suspicious of the rest.
If you really want to understand comms and how much history is not what you'd think it is, then I'd start with this blog. It's a great place to begin digging, but try to keep an open mind. It can be a lot to take in and it make take several readings and doing your own research to really digest it.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/03/secret-prep-for-world-wars-tut-merck-cig/
OK. So I followed the link, prepared to spend some time absorbing new revelations about German history I'm not aware of, and the links in the posts would have me go to The Guardian and the BBC. Really? I don't have time for this.
If garbage is used for references, then everything that follows is...
I sent it just five minutes ago. You couldn't have done more than scan through it and have just decided to call it trash without giving it more than a 2 minute look.
Not sure what you mean by links to the Guardian and the BBC. If you mean the blog posts where it got some of it's clips from, many here do that. It's providing sauce. Many here do that.
A lot have found the Decode Blog very informative and intriguing. It's a very good resource.
If you don't have time to research and dig, then there's nothing anyone can do.
The only thing I directly disputed was the references I posted above with respect to Hitler and Germany. I said I don't dispute the rest of the content, only that it was suspect based upon the flawed premise. I followed the link you provided, and, right at the top, are links as "reference" to known liberal propaganda media sites. My main argument was what was claimed about Hitler and Germany. If you call this "sauce," then it's propaganda to support a flawed idea.
Nothing I've ever read has even SUGGESTED what you claim about Hitler and the Third Reich. Plus, using the term, "Nazi," is also flawed. I'm willing to entertain something new that I'm not aware of, but give me a better source than what was provided. I will invest quite a bit of time in learning something new, if it is compelling. See below.
Europa: The Last Battle is a good resource to start, and cites many additional resources in its content. This was twelve hours' worth, alone. Yes, I do have time, but choose to spend it wisely.