The MSM has been so worried about Q and the "anon" movement. Wonder why there has been so little attempts to identify who Q is? Wonder if many know, but don't want it revealed?
Can't believe all these "journalists" aren't curious.
Thoughts?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
The MSM largely feels like it has identified Q already.
Q's identity being proven as some high level government or military official(s) would be the absolute largest redpill you guys could possibly provide. I am sometimes surprised that there isn't a more concerted effort around here to provide that concrete, indisputable proof of who was typing those words, because I believe you can make or break this movement on Q's proven identity alone.
Between 'disinformation is necessary', 'game theory', and time deltas, absolutely any failure to predict an event can be excused. The first four sentences above are granting a complete 'pass' to any failure.
You have to realise that a lot of people have the mistaken belief that Q predicts future and the past Q proofs imply there are predictions we can make in future as well. This is the biggest flaw both amongst some of the Q followers (mostly those who have never read a single Q drop) and those out side Q community who have limited understanding based on what they hear.
Q is primarily a direct channel to the people that subverts the mainstream, and allows people to dig out truths, some behind the cover of natsec, while maintaining plausible deniability. It also evolved as a channel to deep state, as various [DS] actors started reacting to Q posts, to the point Q even communicated to certain DS actors directly (including Obama, and a Rothschild iirc) a few times. Q also used the posts to send command messages (stringers) to certain operatives because covert community loves messages in plain sight. Finally, since this board was attracting [DS] disinformation was required from day one.
Q proofs are all well and good (John McCain death coincidence for one), but the amount of stuff you can learn for yourself while chasing the clues in the posts is what is of great value to an average Q follower.
I would say that anyone who is either interested in Q, or interested in disproving Q, should read the Q posts from #1 to #76 (it will probably take 30 mins max) (and keep going even if you dont understand anything in some posts) and when you reach 76, if it doesnt affect you immensely, stop reading and walk away. Its not for you.
The reality is Q never said Trump will win 2nd term, he never said Trump will be back. These are logical inferences from everything else we have learnt from Q but the Plan might be very different indeed. Only thing Q has promised is that the Evil that has entrenched itself for centuries is being exterminated and nothing can stop this extermination - no time limits, no other promises. Also, that 95% of the people will wake up by the end of this.
So you are quite comfortable accepting an argument that says, basically, 'When I'm right I'm right, and when I'm wrong, it's because 'disinformation is necessary' - so I'm always right!
In other words, I can say "we will invade China tomorrow at 9am ET". If it happens - boom - proof of my amazing knowledge. And if it doesn't happen, 'disinformation is necessary'. I mean, it's super cool because it means you can never be wrong, but it doesn't stand up to the most basic of analysis.