The guy stood guard in a watchtower overlooking a concentration camp between 1942 and 1945. Now, 76 YEARS LATER.... he's finally on trial for his role in killing 3,518 people.
So basically, he got away with it completely for 76 years... and now at the age of 100 (which he will likely die of old age before ever being sentenced for the crime)... he is finally on trial?
If we use that as a warning to all the doctors, hospitals, executives and politicians who are in a criminal conspiracy pushing the deadly "vax"... they will face justice in 76 years, or some time around the year 2097.
Your point is taken. The law to remedy for the indirect contributions to the holocaust atrocities only became available in 2011. The point being you will eventually be held accountable. 'I was only following orders...' is not a sufficient defense.
That's a REALLY crummy example. :>(
The guy stood guard in a watchtower overlooking a concentration camp between 1942 and 1945. Now, 76 YEARS LATER.... he's finally on trial for his role in killing 3,518 people.
So basically, he got away with it completely for 76 years... and now at the age of 100 (which he will likely die of old age before ever being sentenced for the crime)... he is finally on trial?
If we use that as a warning to all the doctors, hospitals, executives and politicians who are in a criminal conspiracy pushing the deadly "vax"... they will face justice in 76 years, or some time around the year 2097.
Your point is taken. The law to remedy for the indirect contributions to the holocaust atrocities only became available in 2011. The point being you will eventually be held accountable. 'I was only following orders...' is not a sufficient defense.
Yes, this is proper.