The problem with NESARA is that it codifies that which would be accomplished by removing laws, not adding to them.
All of these things that will be accomplished are a fundamental part of things like "free trade" or "inalienable rights". Making MORE laws when we could just remove laws that took away those rights or destroyed free trade in the first place accomplishes the task better. The more laws there are, the more abuse of the system there can be.
We started this country with two pages of laws. Now we have trillions. I think a "Great Reset" back to two pages of laws might be the best path forward.
The problem with NESARA is that it codifies that which would be accomplished by removing laws, not adding to them.
All of these things that will be accomplished are a fundamental part of things like "free trade" or "inalienable rights". Making MORE laws when we could just remove laws that took away those rights or destroyed free trade in the first place accomplishes the task better. The more laws there are, the more abuse of the system there can be.
We started this country with two pages of laws. Now we have trillions. I think a "Great Reset" back to two pages of laws might be the best path forward.
Some times you need to add laws for things to make sure they are not taken away by future laws. The Bill of Rights does this.
The rest of the conversation between me and kula above addresses this specifically.