Husband works for company that has DOD contracts so jab being enforced. Our Dr. refused his medical exemption out of hand saying “our age, 67, 69 make us extremely high risk and we should have had it months ago”. We are being given one more chance to convince her that the jab is dangerous, we don’t need it, we will be fine. Anyone have some strong bullet points to fire at her? She is not one to read articles, listen to long arguments or “the CDC is fudging numbers”. (She is giving us a “video chat” so got to make strong points in limited time!) Thank you to anyone who replies. You are an actual LIFESAVER!🙏❤️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
If your employer is hard core enough to request a letter from your religious leader, is highly likely that nothing other than an allergy to ingredients would be acceptable. Most info I've seen in that vein mention that the only ingredients that might cause allergic reactions are PEG and allergies to that are extremely rare. That's why a lot of medical exemptions are being denied.