Trump thought about that, said he didn't like it and FIRED the person on the spot, called it disrespectful. I, for one, would like to request we cease using this derogatory term. There is no Q-tard. There is no sub-category here. It is poison *(in my humble opinion). WWG1WGA - together, no splits, no elitism.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (144)
sorted by:
I'm not controlling anything, I am simply rejecting the idea there are "retards" here. Shall we call Trump supporters Trumptards? 2A supporters Gun-tards?
It is derogatory - if derogatory is your purpose, fine, I can deal with that, you will receive hostility from me in return. If that hostility is what you want to create, fine, I can place you in that category.
I agree people have the right to say as they please, I retain the right to respond freely. This is that response.
As you can see it causes division - if "it applies" or if it "doesn't apply". That is dividing people into two camps, and labelling them for derision. Better to lift your brother in error rather than brand him as lesser? I don't know... Maybe you are correct and I am being divisive in mentioning it? I don't know...
Let's see what people think, I prefer the old 'pedes moniker, or anon a name we share not a name that applies to some subset we believe ourselves above. I see it as enemy infiltration (if only a concept that has leaked in).
When I see it used, it is not used in irony like "deplorable" I see it used as an attack against someones stupidity - ok - so say "retard" no need for the Q part which implies Q made them retards. Is Q at fault for peoples retardation? no? well then the moniker is propagandistic. If Q is responsible for it, then the user is not in the right place.. .
IMHO. Take or leave.
I noticed the adoption of this.Have to say that perhaps embracing a word might remove its power.
Muh freedom of speech.
There are many who find it more entertaining to interpret their freedom of speech as a license to be as offensive as possible anyway they can get away with. This kind of personality is basically spreading excrement on the walls and calling it art. Getting cheap attention.
Others, myself included, cherish our freedom of speech as a guarantee that our heads will remain on our bodies if the king finds out we are criticizing him.
This is the true meaning of freedom of speech. It was primarily meant to be political discourse.
But I doubt any of our founding fathers were willing to die for your right to call each other obscene names in public. This us how the liberal understands his freedom of speech, to be as destructive and offensive as possible. In other words, just crap all over everything.
A portrait of Mother Mary with cow dung attached. Totally juvenile. Liberals love it.
Peppering this forum with constant faggotry, insults and obscene references is a very effective method to spread excrement on these pages. A new person visiting here would surely not be comfortable.
But I don't mean to step on your freedom of speech. So carry on.