One theory I've seen is that the vaccines were intended by the Deep State to be more deadly than they are, and Operation Warp Speed was meant to force them to be released before they were fully weaponized.

But what if the opposite is true? What if the vaccines are intended to perform some nefarious function other than causing death (such as destroying the natural immune system to keep the vaccinated dependent on boosters for the rest of their lives, injecting nanobots to link the brain and nervous system with an AI for mind control purposes, or something else entirely) - or to only cause death after some extended period of time (perhaps years), and the Deep State wanted to perfect them to the point that they caused no deaths or obvious health problems once injected, and thus seemed harmless (meaning there would be virtually no pushback against taking them)?

This would mean that the vaccines, once perfected, would seem harmless, and those arguing that they are dangerous would be ignored and mocked even far worse than they are now, since no one would be dying, getting heart inflammation, etc from the vaccines. Instead, the vaccines would be a time bomb that that is so stealthy that it doesn't even tick, and the nefarious aspects of them wouldn't be evident until it was too late. This would also make it harder to argue against vaccine mandates, or even to convince anyone to bother standing up against a "harmless" vaccine.

This would mean that Operation Warp Speed was intended to force the vaccines to be released to the public when their dangerous nature would be far more evident, rather than later when they would still be dangerous, but so stealthy as to fool even many who are now awake to their dangers.

What do you think of this theory?