You might consider asking this person how many lawsuits have been filed against the company by anyone in the company who claims that they got the Coof by working with unvaxxed people. Clearly, the answer would be zero.

Then, ask her how someone would PROVE in a court of law that they got their illness from someone in the company, rather than say from family, friends, neighbors, or walking by someone at the grocery store. Clearly, they could NEVER PROVE that they got it from someone at work.

Then, ask her what the company's ACTUAL RISK is, if a vaxxed person who got the Coof could NOT prove it was from an unvaxxed co-worker.

The ACTUAL RISK to the company to NOT have the mandate is ... ZERO RISK.

Then, ask her what the company's risk is to mandate medical treatment, without a medical license to do so, for a medication that is not FDA approved, for which the ingredients have not been disclosed to the public (much less to the employee), and for which thousands of people have died and many hundreds of thousands have experienced serious health complications shortly after receiving.

Then, ask her how many multi-million dollar lawsuits against the company would drive it into bankruptcy.

Then, ask her how the company can even consider issuing a policy that has zero risk if not implemented but potentially could bankrupt the company if implemented.

Is it not a fiduciary violation to the shareholders to potentially bankrupt the company by taking an action, when not taking that action would pose no financial risk?

Maybe the light bulb will go on. Better, maybe she will start asking questions up the chain of command.