I've been getting conflicting answers on these questions and would love a firsthand credible source if anyone knows the answers.
-Is the legally-distinct COMIRNATY jab available in the US (to be distinguished from the EAU version, identical or not)? I have a liberal friend who claims his grandfather received it last month in California and that doesn't compute with what I've read on this site. Made me feel like an idiot.
-Was there ever an official FDA approval for COMIRNATY for ANY age range? The waters have been super muddy regarding this issue but surely after several weeks to read through the paperwork SOMEONE must have an answer by now?
Would love to have these questions resolved once and for all, I think all of us would benefit to have the facts, whether we like them or not.
EDIT: Thank you all for your responses. Seems there is still some disagreement, but these seem to be the most sensible answers I've gained from this.
Question 1: Still not 100% certain but I'm leaning towards NO. I might follow up with my friend's grandfather's clinic to see if they had the actual COMIRNATY shot at the time of his injection. My guess is that they did not, and my friend was mistaken, but that will be hard to verify without a package insert to examine.
Question 2: From Jon Rappoport's letter, it seems that YES, the COMIRNATY shot DID receive full FDA approval for the older age group, while simultaneously receiving EUA for the younger age group.
I care because it's important to get the facts right when arguing with normies. Otherwise I just lose credibility if I repeat talking points that are apparently so easy to disprove. I'd like better sources so I can be more prepared.
So your liberal friend was present and physically observed the vial that was labeled Comirnaty?
Please tell me: Did your friend take a picture of the philosophers stone too while he grabbed one of the Comirnaty vial from which contents were distributed to his grandfather?
Did he provide you a picture of said vial?
I don't believe your liberal friend is being honest or upfront. The FDA said specifically that from their perspective, Comirnaty and Pfizer BioNTech Covid19 are interchangeable in usage. Legally though, the FDA announcement identified they are different and distinct.
Bottom line, I don't believe you lost any credibility outside of not properly questioning your friend on his incredible statement that from what you have shared thus far appears to be offered without proof.
How so?
You are kidding, right?
You can't tell the what the legal ramifications are between FDA approved and eua?
No matter what you believe about the fda, and know to be fact, it matters in legalities. Especially if you're holding onto a job by a thread.
It goes beyond that even, but fuck you have got to be kidding...