I've been getting conflicting answers on these questions and would love a firsthand credible source if anyone knows the answers.
-Is the legally-distinct COMIRNATY jab available in the US (to be distinguished from the EAU version, identical or not)? I have a liberal friend who claims his grandfather received it last month in California and that doesn't compute with what I've read on this site. Made me feel like an idiot.
-Was there ever an official FDA approval for COMIRNATY for ANY age range? The waters have been super muddy regarding this issue but surely after several weeks to read through the paperwork SOMEONE must have an answer by now?
Would love to have these questions resolved once and for all, I think all of us would benefit to have the facts, whether we like them or not.
EDIT: Thank you all for your responses. Seems there is still some disagreement, but these seem to be the most sensible answers I've gained from this.
Question 1: Still not 100% certain but I'm leaning towards NO. I might follow up with my friend's grandfather's clinic to see if they had the actual COMIRNATY shot at the time of his injection. My guess is that they did not, and my friend was mistaken, but that will be hard to verify without a package insert to examine.
Question 2: From Jon Rappoport's letter, it seems that YES, the COMIRNATY shot DID receive full FDA approval for the older age group, while simultaneously receiving EUA for the younger age group.
Haven't heard the 2024 figure myself but overall I have the same impression. I'm puzzled how my friend's grandfather could have received COMIRNATY if it's not available yet in the US. This seems like such a trivial question and it bothers me that we don't seem to know 100% yet.
I will tell you how. The doctor says "Yes yes, this is exactly Comirnaty" and they assume they got Comirnaty.
Yeah this is what I'm thinking as well
The only way to confirm is to look at the paperwork and see what it says on it.
Ask if your grandfather received the package insert of the “Comorbidity“ jab. If the vaxx he got was the FDA “approved” jab, it would have the package insert describing the contents, dosage information, and side effects. The burden of proof is on those who say the vaxx is FDA approved, not on us who say it just received an extended EUA. On the other hand, I wouldn’t trust anything the corrupt bought off FDA “approved“ nowadays! You can always show folks this. The status of the Pfizer jab is described in the first paragraph:
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-booster-dose-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-certain-populations
Instead of being on the defensive, why not ask them to prove it with the package insert? If your word is not good enough why should theirs be?
Also, if you really want to dig into this, all you have to do is call up and ask around a few vaccine centers in that area and ask them whether they can provide vaccines that are actually labelled as Comirnaty.