They’re Doing It: OSHA Sends Employer Vaccine Rule to White House for Final Review
(news.bloomberglaw.com)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
I've been doing research on EO 14043 for Federal Employees. It's flat-out illegal, as it violates current Federal Law. Read this:
"EUA products are by definition experimental and thus require the right to refuse. Under the Nuremberg Code, the foundation of ethical medicine, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is “absolutely essential.” A federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines to soldiers. Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (2003). The court held: "...the United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs." Id. at 135. No court has ever upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine."
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/notice-for-employers-universities-and-other-institutions-mandating-covid-19-vaccines8.31.21.pdf
Now read the EO:
"(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations."
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/14/2021-19927/requiring-coronavirus-disease-2019-vaccination-for-federal-employees
And it violates the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Either the law applies to no one or it applies to everyone, including the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government.
Yup, I'm totally on board. Illegal as all get out. And everyone is following it regardless.