I saw a video from a democratic campaign insider some time ago, he said the ONLY WAY to get your own party to cater to you instead of chasing swing voters is to STOP VOTING FOR THEM when they dont deserve your vote.
The lesser of two evils line is a TRAP. Would you rather be enslaved by the uniparty forever or lose one election cycle and take back your power to actually elect true leaders.
Just look at how the shills are out in force to make damn sure to muddy the waters and keep this information away from you.
That campaign insider was lying. The only way to get the party to cater to you is to get active at the precinct, district and state levels to control what candidate is selected to run. Anyone who tells you that you can't control who the candidates are is hiding reality from you and lying. You can also, by being active, determine whether a caucus, a convention or a primary is used to select candidates.
And those candidates will cater to leftists because YOUR vote is already locked in, they will blatantly betray you again and again because you have PROVEN you are otherwise politically homeless and wont stop voting for them.
What and when have you ever attended a local party caucus, been a delegate to a district or state convention? Your vote is not already locked in. I've seen it happen more than once - the state party, what would now be called rinos, selects a candidate to push but another candidate hustles and wins the nomination by having more supporters show up at the caucus or convention. Go look at how Ollie North became the US Senate candidate in Virginia in 1994. I was there and saw it happen.
I would love to see Trump break from the GOP and start a Patriot's party but the chances of that happening and succeeding are less than slim. Maybe down the road but not now.
If the establishment republicans think Ross Perot, and Ron Paul took a chunk of "their" votes, wait till they see what Trump can (and should) do to those traitors bastards.
Ron took a chunk from both parties. That's why he had to be muted.
94 was a very different time than present day.
Comparing the two is an extreme intellectual error.
You don't say. What are your intellectual bona fides? What is your practical political experience? Be sure to tell us what you're doing now to fix these problems in the present day.
None of that applies in a presidential election, but I think you already know that and are muddying the waters.
You know I'm not a shill or muddying waters. And, it does apply to presidential. It all starts at the local level. It ALL starts at the local level. How do you think Trump won the nomination and the election in 2016? Despite GOP shenanigans against him. And btw, I would never vote for anyone just because they're a Republican. By the same token, I would never refuse to vote for a good candidate just because they're a Republican and I'm ticked off at the GOP. I can promise you, you're no madder at those toads than I am, probably less so.
I'd register NPA (No Party Affiliation) if it was an option. Then follow John Q. Adams advice:
**Just don't violate your conscience doing it!