I feel your pain. We have been hearing this since the flippin' election of 2020
What about those forced to take it to keep their jobs? Rather a graceless position, considering that the funds could come from the vaxx makers and pushers, rather than the taxpayer.
I did too, likely we all did.
Am I betting it will be OK to quote the Koran, or against it?
My bet (rather cynical as it is) would be at least 20oz of silver on 'only peaceful quoting of the Koran' , no quoting of the violence verses.
Thank you, and note STM's comment!:
STM @Stw3334 1h Replying to @EndWokeness
Maybe make sure they don't put a knife in their backpack to take to school and not to kill somebody if you don't like what they say to you. And, oh yeah, the news isn't reporting that several of the witnesses who testified against Kamelo, who said he was clearly the aggressor and it wasn't self defense, were blacks. I wonder why they aren't reporting that?
(got a bit creative with the stars here, but think it justified!)
That was my first thought!
Agreed! It addresses the liability issue better, IMHO.
See my most recent post on 2000 Mules And Charlie Kirk: and comment)
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASsnIyNLZ/shocking-connection-between-char/c/
Conversation from book, page 85 - 89:
Dinesh: Okay, guys, you've heard it. You've seen the evidence. What do you think?
Larry Elder: Republicans had no clue this was going on.
Charlie Kirk: Trump, to his credit, tweeted out in July, mail-in ballots are a disaster, and he was attacked so hard by Kemp and Ducey and so many other people.
Larry Elder: But he didn't have this information, obviously.
Charlie Kirk: His instinct ended up being right.
Larry Elder: But I mean, Republicans had no idea this was going on during the election.
Eric Metaxas: You're talking about extraordinary criminal activity.
Sebastian Gorka: What is the fraction of the election you covered? Did you cover 10 percent of the election? I've done the math, and you're talking about 2 or 300,000 ballots in only a few geolocations. But you're talking about, what, 5 percent of America?
Gregg: Less.
Sebastian Gorka: Less than 5 percent, okay. So case closed. Sorry gentlemen, lady, case closed.
Charlie Kirk: It looks pretty convincing to me. I don't think we'll ever know the full story, and what makes this crime so compelling and unique is that once the ballot enters the system it's really hard to reverse engineer. But when you have the geolocation data and then the actual footage of them doing what you expect them to be doing, taking pictures of the ballots, taking gloves off, visiting multiple times, I mean, it seems pretty clear to me. I've seen enough. And forget the Trump part of it, the control of the U.S. Senate went through Georgia with a tiny margin of votes. So Chuck Schumer is majority leader probably because of what we just saw.
Sebastian Gorka: What do we have empirically? We have data geolocated; we have footage of people harvesting ballots. Do we know who those ballots are for? We can't know who they were for. However, you have to inject common sense. Are we saying that in the centers of Democrat-held districts we are seeing hundreds and hundreds of visits to drop boxes with Trump ballots? It beggars belief. The election was stolen, and I don't need to have spurious theories about computers and foreign agents. If you look at the tradition of these cities, what do we know about them for fifty, sixty, seventy years? They are centers of left-wing voter fraud. This time we had the perfect storm. When you mail out tens of millions of ballots it's the equivalent of taking the contents of the bank and putting the bullion and the cash in the middle of the street. That's what happened.
Eric Metaxas: I'm sickened. I'm basically almost speechless. The level of cynicism involved in this vast criminal enterprise is to my mind demonic. There's a contempt for Americans, people like my old mother and father who voted, that's un-American and horrifying. I know most Americans will be absolutely sickened by this. They're not as cynical as the ruling classes that chatter on TV and write their columns. So I'm happy you're making this film, because you're telling them they're not crazy. That which they have suspected is in fact happening.
Dennis Prager: People know I'm crazy about telling the truth. If one guy won and there were serious accusations of cheating, I would want to clear my guy's name. That would be a moral sense, and even an enlightened selfishness on my part. You think our guy got elected unfairly, let's show you that didn't happen. So it's not a good sign that one side doesn't want any investigation. For their own sake, they should want it. Number two, I voted for Donald Trump with passion, but I root for his having been defeated honestly. I'd rather lose honestly than have this come out as the way in which we lost. I love my country more than I want to win a debate. But if what--number three--if what you've shown is true, and the video is pretty powerful. I came in as an agnostic because my whole basis of saying I have any doubts about the legitimacy of the election was that there were too many anomalies. But I wasn't prepared to say--that's what an agnostic is, you're not prepared to say. What you showed is frightening. I'd like to hear the other side's answer to all this.
Charlie Kirk: They have two ways they'll try to invalidate it. One is minimizing and then slander.
Sebastian Gorka: Yeah.
Charlie Kirk: So they'll try to slander Dinesh personally, they'll say, "Oh, Trump pardoned him," or whatever and therefore he's trying to pay Trump back and reinforce the big lie. I can already see the headline in the Washington Post, "Trump-Pardoned Ally Comes Out with Questionable Movie." Then they'll minimize it. They'll say it was only this and only that at the fringes. Then the third thing they do is to go to arguments from authority. I read the New York Times too. Not as much as you do, Dennis. They'll say, "DOD, FBI, the intelligence community all unanimously say this was the most secure election." And so to an untrained eye, they'll say, "Well, if all those agencies say that, then how could it be wrong?" So slander, minimization, arguments from authority.
Sebastian Gorka: One more, I predict right now they'll say, "What on earth is a conservative doing tracking private citizens? What is Dinesh D'Souza doing to voters?"
Charlie Kirk: Invasion of privacy.
Sebastian Gorka: At 3:00 a.m. and that will be part of it.
Charlie Kirk: Intimidation will be the word. They'll say no person is safe. Communities of color are being tracked. People in black neighborhoods are now going to have to fear for their life that their cellphone pings will be paired. And this is Jim Crow 2.0, Dinesh, is what it is.
Sebastian Gorka: Dinesh, get ready.
Larry Elder: I disagree with everybody that this is not going to be compelling enough. This is a smoking gun. This is jaw-dropping. This is O. J. Simpson being seen leaving the scene of the crime. I don't care how partisan you are, you can't dismiss all of this. You can dismiss some of it. How do you explain somebody going to a whole bunch of different drop boxes with a whole bunch of different ballots on the same night at 3:57 in the morning? How are you going to explain that? I'm sorry, I think a whole bunch of people in this country are going to go, "Oh my God." And as for the leaders in both parties, they're going to have to come to grips with this.
Charlie Kirk: This is an Overton window moment. So documentaries can do this every once in a while. Michael Moore did it. He moved the Overton window on many different topics many years ago. Al Gore did it with climate change. This project, 2000 Mules, will move the Overton window generally on how we view voting, especially in urban areas. The Overton window is the spectrum of how we view ideas in modern society. It goes from things that are unacceptable and unthinkable to policy. We all live the Overton window every day. Twenty years ago, you would have thought the idea of a transgender swimmer competing against women would be unthinkable. Now it's policy at the University of Pennsylvania. Defund the police went from something that was unthinkable to policy. The same thing is going to happen, I believe, because of 2000 Mules. It will happen, as Ernest Hemingway said, gradually and then suddenly, because it's not just how many people are going to watch the film. It's going to be lawmakers. It's going to be people that work for the Bureau. It's going to be someone somewhere with a conscience that has power and says, "This is a problem."
Larry Elder: It can't be dismissed.
Charlie Kirk: And it won't be.
Or the Great Spirit!
Love the appropriateness of this....
Doubt it. But it would be a deterrent if they could, just saying.
what we need to nuke is the way current filibusters are done, and go back to the talking filibuster. (see comment above)
We need to nuke the current form of the filibuster, and restore the talking filibuster. Make Congress Work for Their Pay!
Fresh Antics will be coming to you shortly... in spite of my hand misbehaving. (feels tight, hurts too -)
That's what I was thinking!
Hope you are doing well!
Honestly, that's what I thought he was saying, then I read more closely - But I agree, all the Democrats and RINOs who are calling for amnesty for illegal aliens should be deported to the countries they support. They can serve on the frontlines in Ukraine, Somalia, Mexico, China, ....
The Holderness Family did a whole parody about the whole chaos in 2020, and one of the lyrics was "I'm not even mentioning the flippin' election"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DRternsL3M