Her name was Tiffany Dover. Her maiden name was Tiffany Pontes. She married a man named Dustin Dover. The are trying to scrub this stuff from the web. People saying she was a regular on social media and she has stopped posting. The media are attacking people asking about her well being, calling them anti-vaxxers. The family has spoke out and said she was ok. Why does the family have to speak for her? Why can't she speak for herself? She didn't have any issues going on TV to take the vaccine but now she is avoiding the public? It sure does seem like she died and they are trying to cover it up.
Here is a youtube video of the incident, read the comment section.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhb1zIYXUP8
If you search for Tiffany Dover Obituary using Duck Duck Go you get all kinds of hits.
Here is a Bitchute video of someone looking her up through school photos and Ancestory dot com. She is listed as dead.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/13Ei999rGlaZ/
Supposedly she took the shot on December 18th, 3 days later there is a picture with hospital staff surrounding someone who looks like Tiffany holding signs saying we support Tiffany with a date on it. So 3 days later they are trying create proof that she was still alive and this would be before rumors that she died, seems kinda fishy. Here is the article with the pic.(note the picture of the pedophile on the wall)
Here is a article from the DailyBeast saying she is alive and well according to official sources. Why do they have to ask official sources, why don't they ask her?
Here is another article saying people are harassing hospital staff by calling to ask if she is sill alive. (Is it really harassment to ask about someone's wellbeing?) The article says thousands of people are posting to her Instagram, one person say she will not stop till she gets a answer. The hospital response was she is at home doing fine, they said they would post a picture of her and never did.
Here is a article saying she has been seen in videos and pictures but they don't provide the video or pictures.
Stay safe my pureblood frens!!
WWG1WGA!!!
Not necessarily though. And I don’t really find it that sad. You’re always welcome to reach out if you want to keep talking.
Okay, I'll bite.
Sure, 'not necessarily', though what logical reason exists to continue to perpetuate this uncertainty?
One would think that it would behoove those pushing the vax, those that initially put the nurse on camera to be vaxxed, to dispel rumors of her untimely death following the vax. It would be easy enough to do, though for some reason it has not been done.
Why not? What benefit exists that would be negated by providing 'proof of life' that might lead them to choose to not dispel the rumor?
Imho, they have nothing to lose & significant advantage to gain by dispelling these rumors, though they have not. Why not? Somebody's razor implies to me that they have not because they cannot because she is not alive.
At his point, MONTHS have gone by. IF she were alive it’s possible that those around her don’t care enough to give you the time of day, which is certainly something not out of the realm of possibility.
Ultimately, to answer your question, what logical reason is there to perpetuate uncertainty…
I don’t think anything is being perpetuated. I think you are uncertain, and I think it’s quite likely that without SIGNIFICANT effort on your part you will continue to be uncertain. I don’t think there’s any reason for you to put forth that effort, but I’m just being realistic in your expectations.
So the best we can do is make do with the information we have
Proof of life has not been supplied to you in a sufficient way. That I understand and can accept. I can also say that I am confident that nothing I can find (without more than a few minutes effort) will likely be able to be sufficient proof.
However, I take into account everyone’s viewpoint, not just yours. Logically, I can say that anyone who had any sort of relationship with her, similar to you, also wanted some sort of proof of life in order to be satisfied. If they hadn’t, I would logically presume that they would be similar to you, wanting that sort of proof from somebody.
IF she was alive, it appears as though those close to her, at least, have gotten the proof they need, which is why there is not much outcry aside from forums like this.
Now IF she were dead, we’re not seeing that sort of outcry. General answer to this has been that they are being paid off/threatened by big pharma to keep quiet. This seems initially feasible, since they likely are swimming with disposable funding, but that is an incredible amount of loose ends to tie up. Presumably, they would have to keep quiet every coworker, neighbor, family member, former acquaintance…almost anyone. I take this from a general perspective, as well as my own thought that if someone I knew even at a distance made national headlines for being dead or not dead or whatever conspiracy, I would absolutely need some sufficient proof of life and wouldn’t be quiet about it. I say this if this was a 5th grade classmate I wasn’t even friends with. I wouldn’t stop talking about it with people who also had that similar connection.
So, I want to at least start here so you can see how I have a lot of trouble discussing the WHY when I still can’t get past the HOW
To clarify further, I said “not necessarily” to your statement that sufficient proof won’t be provided. The way I see it, it seems likely that sufficient proof HAS been provided to people vastly more familiar with the situation than you or I. So, the proof of life may not be provided to you, in some easy to digest material. Perhaps you can go seek out the hospital where she was supposed to work and seek out more sufficient proof if you’re looking for it.
I don’t think it’s really worth it for you, and I wouldn’t encourage it, but at this point IF she were really dead so suddenly…shouldn’t there be more examples of this than Tiffany Dover? We have not seen a single instance of anyone else having such a severe reaction. Why not find someone else?