The write up here is interesting in regards to symbolism and comms. Major parts of what the author has stated in this article are demonstrably false and entirely not true. The sections stating nuclear nombs arent real and that nuclear power plants use a chemical process is absolutely laughably wrong. I work in those industries, nuclear material and nuclear power and the materials that are used and the by products made from the generation of nuclear power and from nuclear bombs. Im not saying the article isnt worth reading or considering as far as symbolism and comms etc. But anyone reading should use discernment for some parts. Those sections on power plants and nuclear bombs are far fetched theories very far from the truth.