So I guess the logical step would be for the State Board to list what is misinformation, so no one steps on the wrong crack in the floor. Then tbey can verify WHY its misinformation.
No freedom of speech? Who defines what is disinformation or misinformation? When did a consensus of idiots with an agenda become truth? I will fire the first doctor that tries to sell me on consensus driven information.
I want to know the following: 1). Who sits on the Tennessee Medical Board, 2) Who put out this statement, 3) Did they take direction from the AMA, if yes who provided that direction, 4) Are they receiving any remuneration of any kind to present this dictate whether monetary, goods or promises of positions or promotions, 5) Kindly enumerate in depth the information you deem is correct and is to be shared and what is deemed misinformation. This all needs to be provided under oath, sworn to, or notarized. Those involved will be held accountable for themselves providing false information which they compel other professionals to spread under threat of license revocation.
It would be funny if all the complaints filed were for malpractice for not prescribing ivermectin and patients died because of it.
Say there’s an idea …
In my experience, most state medical boards have at least some corrupt members on them who are more than willing to make sure no doctor in their jurisdiction is creative or too caring. Just another reason to never become a doctor. Or a teacher. Or any other profession with a ruling board, for that matter. Power corrupts.
So I guess the logical step would be for the State Board to list what is misinformation, so no one steps on the wrong crack in the floor. Then tbey can verify WHY its misinformation.
No freedom of speech? Who defines what is disinformation or misinformation? When did a consensus of idiots with an agenda become truth? I will fire the first doctor that tries to sell me on consensus driven information.
I want to know the following: 1). Who sits on the Tennessee Medical Board, 2) Who put out this statement, 3) Did they take direction from the AMA, if yes who provided that direction, 4) Are they receiving any remuneration of any kind to present this dictate whether monetary, goods or promises of positions or promotions, 5) Kindly enumerate in depth the information you deem is correct and is to be shared and what is deemed misinformation. This all needs to be provided under oath, sworn to, or notarized. Those involved will be held accountable for themselves providing false information which they compel other professionals to spread under threat of license revocation.
Ding doing this is nz too.
If they say "safe and effective", they loose their license. That works for me.
It would be funny if all the complaints filed were for malpractice for not prescribing ivermectin and patients died because of it. Say there’s an idea …
In my experience, most state medical boards have at least some corrupt members on them who are more than willing to make sure no doctor in their jurisdiction is creative or too caring. Just another reason to never become a doctor. Or a teacher. Or any other profession with a ruling board, for that matter. Power corrupts.