Hope that good is winning and evil is losing. Here's what I see upon looking back at their Johns Hopkins Spars plan for the pandemic.

posted 3 years ago by p1lgrim 3 years ago by p1lgrim +23 / -0

Johns Hopkins released this report about their "wargame" in 2017 for a future pandemic. https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/spars-pandemic-scenario-copy.pdf

Much of what happens in the scenario's first 52 pages is eerily similar to what has happened in our world the past year and a half. But then, you get to page 55 and the "vaccine injury" chapter and things start to diverge dramatically. On 55 we see that they planned for the majority of people to be vaccianted. "Vaccination rates eventually began increasing across all targeted demographics except the most recalcitrant anti-vaccine activists." Nope! That hasn't happened, and if you read around this section that's where their plan really must be completely off the rails.

Good is winning. Evil is losing the narrative.

Also, later in the report it talks about the vaccine injuries and "reports of new neurological symptoms began to emerge.”

We're not out of the woods yet, and I fear there will be suffering... but I also think we've crossed a threshold. Good is derailing their plans.

3 comments

3 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (3)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– chicagotrauma 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

I read that too. I agree 100%

I think they have no choice but to go full steam ahead, even though their plan has fallen by the wayside.

I only hope they continue to lose and the whole shitty plan fails

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– p1lgrim [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yeah. I feel like they would have to physically force people at this point to hit their original projections, and that would lead to a whole other set of problems for them.

permalink parent save report block reply