I’ve been trying to make sense of it. The PCRs are %100 defective in my mind so seeing that 1:1 was interesting.
If I step back maybe that’s the entire base premise of “Covid is just bad Flu B” which is entirely possible.
No clue. Times like this I wish I was a microbiologist / virologist etc that knew how to validate directly. I’ve talked to a number of folks in the field that I trust but all drink the kool aid and haven’t dissected samples down personally. So it’s just cult of personality versus cult of personality with maximum ass hurt if I dare question. It’s actually wild. These folks get brazenly triggered if I am in any way skeptical or ask to see data. The indoctrination is super severe
Ya I get pretty immediately dismissive when indirectly ask and they confirm they did no controls. I don’t really care who you are - if you claim science then actually science. Replicate it and know it. I work in Open Source programming and we still have to exercise everything continuously. These cats I know just parrot. It’s almost like the rule “if someone claims to be smart they are the dumbest son of a bitch in the room”. Some of us take pride in the possibility of being wrong - we like the idea we can improve vastly - honestly & quickly.
I need to grab the exact kits tomorrow. Going to see what I can drag out. I’ve put this formally on the back burner for too long. The curiosity has me
Applied Biosystems COVID-19 Interpretive Software EUA Edition
Decrease analysis and interpretation time and help reduce risk of user interpretation error with our COVID-19 Interpretive Software EUA Edition. This software automatically converts genetic analysis data into a readable report.
Glaring red flag.
This is the Central SYSCTL type data consolidation crap for results.
They’re one trick ponies pushing this crap.
Everything needs to be On Prem. I guess the glory of this is write software complicated enough you can just toss whatever you want in on results etc?
I’ve been trying to make sense of it. The PCRs are %100 defective in my mind so seeing that 1:1 was interesting.
If I step back maybe that’s the entire base premise of “Covid is just bad Flu B” which is entirely possible.
No clue. Times like this I wish I was a microbiologist / virologist etc that knew how to validate directly. I’ve talked to a number of folks in the field that I trust but all drink the kool aid and haven’t dissected samples down personally. So it’s just cult of personality versus cult of personality with maximum ass hurt if I dare question. It’s actually wild. These folks get brazenly triggered if I am in any way skeptical or ask to see data. The indoctrination is super severe
Ya I get pretty immediately dismissive when indirectly ask and they confirm they did no controls. I don’t really care who you are - if you claim science then actually science. Replicate it and know it. I work in Open Source programming and we still have to exercise everything continuously. These cats I know just parrot. It’s almost like the rule “if someone claims to be smart they are the dumbest son of a bitch in the room”. Some of us take pride in the possibility of being wrong - we like the idea we can improve vastly - honestly & quickly.
I need to grab the exact kits tomorrow. Going to see what I can drag out. I’ve put this formally on the back burner for too long. The curiosity has me
Glaring red flag.
This is the Central SYSCTL type data consolidation crap for results.
They’re one trick ponies pushing this crap.
Everything needs to be On Prem. I guess the glory of this is write software complicated enough you can just toss whatever you want in on results etc?