A lot of us have discussed this. Here is an article from Drs. Morell, Cowan, and Kaufman that is the best I have seen.
https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
He discusses the steps needed to prove that something is pathogenic. He then states:
None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.
... since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.”
This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.
The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.
Takeaways:
the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
The "spike protein" is hypothetical, not proven in the "virus" itself. However, this might be something included in some vaccines.
the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
This is why they are using a genome of the "virus" that was created in a computer model, not something physically discovered in a lab sample.
“variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
This is why there is no test that can identify Delta Variant.
it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19
People have been getting sick. But there is no actual evidence that it is a virus that has been causing the illnesses.
From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation.
[NOTE: The 'Vero' lineage was isolated from kidney epithelial cells extracted from an African green monkey. The lineage was developed on 27 March 1962, by Yasumura and Kawakita at the Chiba University in Chiba. -- Wikipedia]
Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?
Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.
We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.
It is ALL based on FRAUD. Any face mask request or mandate, any vaccine request or mandate, any social distancing request or mandate, and tracking request or mandate is based on FRAUD. Any lawsuit should include a charge of fraud, in addition to other claims.
Theory: They most likely DO have an isolated virus. So, why are they saying otherwise? Because if the isolated virus is released and examined, it will show that it has been modified for gain of function. And, guess who was working on gain of function research?