“ Peer-reviewed” is a dog whistle for Starbucks baristas, journalists, and liberal arts majors. It’s an absolutely worthless phrase and an unnecessary and corrupt process. No one with an IQ above 110 really gives a shit whether it’s peer-reviewed or not.
The real litmus test is “reproducible results”, not “per-reviewed”
If you can't assess whether a study was adequately peer reviewed and confirmed rather than jumping to either "believe all the science" or "it's all bullshit", you have no right to have any opinion.
“ Peer-reviewed” is a dog whistle for Starbucks baristas, journalists, and liberal arts majors. It’s an absolutely worthless phrase and an unnecessary and corrupt process. No one with an IQ above 110 really gives a shit whether it’s peer-reviewed or not.
The real litmus test is “reproducible results”, not “per-reviewed”
If you can't assess whether a study was adequately peer reviewed and confirmed rather than jumping to either "believe all the science" or "it's all bullshit", you have no right to have any opinion.