Are the vaxxed GMO and no longer qualifying as humans and therefore HAVE NO HUMAN RIGHTS? Thoughts, impressions, feels?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Question proposed while getting input from faraway friends.
My vaxxed adult sons & daughters and their significant others are fully human, have committed no crimes that would deprive them of their rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These are God-given rights and NO ONE can take those rights from my kids because of a vaxx. Anyone or any document that says different does not understand the Declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights, nor basic genetic science. Cancer hijacks your DNA, and so do many other viruses... but you do not become anything other than human.
NO, the vaxx does not make you subhuman, or trans-human.
It may greatly damage your health or even prevent you from conceiving and carrying to term genetically healthy children, but damaged DNA only makes one unhealthy, not unhuman. We are all one human race. Do not let this unscientific theory divide you from those who were persuaded to take the vaxx. Divided we are weak, united we are strong. Anyone who is against the vaxx mandates- whether they are vaxxed or not- is still an ally.
The Supreme Court ruled on this I believe in 2012 and indeed considered property of the patent owner because the DNA sequence did not occur naturally.
It’s a harsh reality and only found out about 2 months ago.
Edited to add link:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf
Read last page of Justice Scalia’s opinion to save time.
Just about everyone I know is injected, and to tell you the truth, none hold an ill grudge towards me, nor do I do the same. No point on causing division in anyway even knowing what I know about this. They are adults and can make their own decisions.
On an ending note and on page 1 saw some symbolism:
“Argued April 15, 2013—Decided June 13, 2013“
Didnt the Titanic sink on April 15th 1913?
Scalia couldnt pick some other day he decided?
I think you are conflating this ruling about 'owning a patent' for the process by which they isolate a gene with the idea of owning a person. Their patent is on a therapeutic or investigative process in examining the gene.
Doesn't the emancipation proclamation pretty well cover this? We were born human... we are still human. Maybe we can focus on running for local public office instead of this.
I provided the documentation and his ruling, whether you want to hold me responsible for his opinion or not, that is on you, but this is called denial and shooting the messenger...
Others in this thread have mentioned this same ruling and came to same conclusion. I suggest you read it as it is apparent you have not even when it is one single paragraph I pointed out to you to consider.