Would there be riots? If all Fed contractors and all businesses with 100 or more employees must why not welfare? Why are there no lawsuits here?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
You misunderstood the point. The answer to the question is self-evident. If welfare recipients were told to either get the COVID-19 vaxx or lose your benefits, there would be riots in the streets the same day. On a level playing field, mandating one class of people to be vaxxed and another class not to be mandated is discrimination and egregiously violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This EO directly challenges the Civil Rights Act.
So, why didn't the EO include the Welfare benefit recipients? What is the legal definition of a benefit? A benefit is not compensation.
The reason the EO didn't include the Welfare recipients is because government fear of riots. Does this mean welfare recipients won't be mandated? No. They are next in line.
The EO is designed to deconstruct the United States by economic class. They are going after the working class first. Once the working class is hobbled and destroyed, and this means many businesses will perish as well, only the large international corporations survive. It just so happens these corporations do not share our interests.
Once this criteria succeeds, then the tyranny will turn to the welfare class. They will be mandated to take the vaxx or lose their welfare benefits. The police State will be the enforcers for preventing rioters from destroying businesses and maintaining order.