and just because you read on someones blog that words can be "weaponized" does not mean you're right in what you're saying.
You are attempting to discredit my words by attacking my source (of which you are completely ignorant). In this case your assumption of my source happens to be completely incorrect, I did not get my information from any blog, but from the C_A documentation on "conspiracy theorist" and substantial deep dives into past newspapers.
This will all be coming out in Part 2 of my report on the media. The detail and sourcing is exhaustive.
well your first source, of the source of anti-semitism, you convenentialy forgot that it was created by an anti-semite so yeah, i of course doubted your sources.
I didn't conveniently forget anything. I literally have no idea why that is relevant.
Besides, not all is what it seems.
The best way to control the narrative is to control both sides of it. The evidence for that is also overwhelming. It will be in my report.
i highly doubt your sources.
Read Part 1 of my report (linked above) it will give you an idea of what type of sourcing I do (primary sources or publicly available databases only).
It's not about what we are talking about (directly) but it is a gateway to a much larger world than you seem to be aware of.
Its also best to not start name calling. That does no one (nor the conversation) any good.
You are attempting to discredit my words by attacking my source (of which you are completely ignorant). In this case your assumption of my source happens to be completely incorrect, I did not get my information from any blog, but from the C_A documentation on "conspiracy theorist" and substantial deep dives into past newspapers.
This will all be coming out in Part 2 of my report on the media. The detail and sourcing is exhaustive.
Part 1 can be found here. It is not about the media, but it leads into it.
I didn't conveniently forget anything. I literally have no idea why that is relevant.
Besides, not all is what it seems.
The best way to control the narrative is to control both sides of it. The evidence for that is also overwhelming. It will be in my report.
Read Part 1 of my report (linked above) it will give you an idea of what type of sourcing I do (primary sources or publicly available databases only).
It's not about what we are talking about (directly) but it is a gateway to a much larger world than you seem to be aware of.
Its also best to not start name calling. That does no one (nor the conversation) any good.