can you tell me, with 100% certainty, that he was not a lizard person alien? in fact, NO studies have done to determine whether he had lizard DNA or whether he would shed his skin while toasting under a heat lamp. I've heard rumors that he laid eggs, but could not confirm these. In fact, the very fact that there has been NO discussion by the mainstream media into his lizard ancestry means they MUST be hiding something!
and follow with
Do you realize how fucking stupid you sound?
Back at ya. This is called a straw man argument. It has nothing to do with what I was talking about nor the evidence (such as it was) that I presented, but you want to pretend that they are the same thing.
you looked into hitlers jewish origins
What?
I showed evidence that he was Jewish. Where do you get that I found he wasn't Jewish? You REALLY need to read what I am writing, not pretending I am saying things I am not.
the cognitive dissonance you have is astounding.
Believe it or not, I am trying to help you out of this exact trap.
analogy: a comparison of two things based on their being alike in some way
Your statements of "the media not talking about Hitler being an alien" and my statements of "here is evidence that supports Hitler being a Jew" are not "alike" in any way, therefore it was not an analogy.
Your evidence/source that he was jewish literally ended with "DESPITE THESE CLAIMS, ADOLF HITLER WAS NOT JEWISH".
...
Did you not read what I wrote?
They gave nothing but evidence that said Hitler was a jew.
Then they ended with "Despite these claims, Adolf Hitler was not Jewish."
They provided nothing but evidence that supports it.
Do you not see?
Can't you see?
One more time.
They provided nothing but evidence that supports it.
...
Why do you think that the MAIN JEWISH SOURCE ended with "Hitler was not a Jew" after providing NOTHING but evidence that supported him being a Jew?
Think...
What is the difference between evidence and statements?
You said:
and follow with
Back at ya. This is called a straw man argument. It has nothing to do with what I was talking about nor the evidence (such as it was) that I presented, but you want to pretend that they are the same thing.
What?
I showed evidence that he was Jewish. Where do you get that I found he wasn't Jewish? You REALLY need to read what I am writing, not pretending I am saying things I am not.
Believe it or not, I am trying to help you out of this exact trap.
Your statements of "the media not talking about Hitler being an alien" and my statements of "here is evidence that supports Hitler being a Jew" are not "alike" in any way, therefore it was not an analogy.
...
Did you not read what I wrote?
They gave nothing but evidence that said Hitler was a jew.
Then they ended with "Despite these claims, Adolf Hitler was not Jewish."
They provided nothing but evidence that supports it.
Do you not see?
Can't you see?
One more time.
They provided nothing but evidence that supports it.
...
Why do you think that the MAIN JEWISH SOURCE ended with "Hitler was not a Jew" after providing NOTHING but evidence that supported him being a Jew?
Think...
What is the difference between evidence and statements?
I tried so hard to help you break free, but I won't abide such unwarranted disrespect.
We are done.