This is not a blind spot. Trump knows as much or more about the vaccines than we do. So what you need to ask is do you believe Trump would deliberately encourage us to take or do something that is detrimental to our well being.
It appears he doesn't know more about the jab than we do. I look at data, statistics and science. The jab is unnecessary for most of the population. It may or may not be beneficial for high risk. It is not an immunity vaccine.
so are you pro jab now? did you take the shot? I will die before I take it.
It is definitely not working as advertised. I think the virus is beating it. I don't know why he's encouraging it, but Trump has earned enough credibility with me that I don't think he would encourage people to get something he would know to be detrimental. He was part of the team that fought covid with far better success than Biden and company, so I assume he knows alot about it.
You honestly think that a billionaire former (or current?) President of the US doesn't have access to Intel as good or better than anons on a messaging board?
This logic is exactly backwards. "Don't evaluate what you heard - ask yourself if he would say something like that, and if you decide he wouldn't then you didn't hear it."
He said it. He encourages people to take it. It IS dangerous, almost a million adverse events reported to VAERS. More deaths than all vaccines in history combined. It doesn't square. We have to accept it. Question everything. Ask questions.
A valid argument. However, we can't end our analysis there. We know this action would be totally incongruent with who Trump appears to be in every other aspect. I don't subscribe to the "acting for the DS for controlled opposition" theory for the simple reason that no one would persist through the gauntlet they have put Trump through unless they were sincere and devoted to the cause that they appear to support. Acting can only go so far. So these warrant further study before writing Trump off.
I don't think he would. Trump has earned that level of credibility. I think the goal of those trying to force the vax is not to get everyone vaccinated, but to get everyone on the vaccine passports, as well as set up the infrastructure for future delivery of future nanotech and bioweaponry that would be bad for us. Encouragement of voluntary reciept of a vaccine does not further these evil goals.
I think he's earn the credibility for us not to assume he wants us to take something that is bad for us. So we must ask why is he encouraging this and explore all possible answers.
This is not a blind spot. Trump knows as much or more about the vaccines than we do. So what you need to ask is do you believe Trump would deliberately encourage us to take or do something that is detrimental to our well being.
It appears he doesn't know more about the jab than we do. I look at data, statistics and science. The jab is unnecessary for most of the population. It may or may not be beneficial for high risk. It is not an immunity vaccine.
so are you pro jab now? did you take the shot? I will die before I take it.
It is definitely not working as advertised. I think the virus is beating it. I don't know why he's encouraging it, but Trump has earned enough credibility with me that I don't think he would encourage people to get something he would know to be detrimental. He was part of the team that fought covid with far better success than Biden and company, so I assume he knows alot about it.
You honestly think that a billionaire former (or current?) President of the US doesn't have access to Intel as good or better than anons on a messaging board?
'So you are pro jab now?'
Effing toxic as comments
what are you saying? Other than anger directed at me I see now point or purpose in your posts on this subject.
Anger? Where did I express anger?
I merely pointed out the manipulative language/logic used in your retort & made an observation regarding the quality of these comments.
This logic is exactly backwards. "Don't evaluate what you heard - ask yourself if he would say something like that, and if you decide he wouldn't then you didn't hear it."
He said it. He encourages people to take it. It IS dangerous, almost a million adverse events reported to VAERS. More deaths than all vaccines in history combined. It doesn't square. We have to accept it. Question everything. Ask questions.
A valid argument. However, we can't end our analysis there. We know this action would be totally incongruent with who Trump appears to be in every other aspect. I don't subscribe to the "acting for the DS for controlled opposition" theory for the simple reason that no one would persist through the gauntlet they have put Trump through unless they were sincere and devoted to the cause that they appear to support. Acting can only go so far. So these warrant further study before writing Trump off.
I don't think he would. Trump has earned that level of credibility. I think the goal of those trying to force the vax is not to get everyone vaccinated, but to get everyone on the vaccine passports, as well as set up the infrastructure for future delivery of future nanotech and bioweaponry that would be bad for us. Encouragement of voluntary reciept of a vaccine does not further these evil goals.
I think he's earn the credibility for us not to assume he wants us to take something that is bad for us. So we must ask why is he encouraging this and explore all possible answers.