Neutral isn’t quite the right word as I don’t mean neutral like “no opinion” but more like, “No shift from the mainstream narrative consensus.” Obviously the mainstream narrative consensus is not itself neutral but I think, to an extent, the comparison to 9/11 makes sense. As President, Trump would know about Building 7, the Bushes, Mossad, etc. But then when he delivers a commemorative speech about 9/11, he follows the mainstream “official” narrative. Is that lying? Well - yeah. But I also know what a tactical error it would be for him, at that time, to start going off on, “This was an inside job, the U.S. government was behind this, dancing Israelis!” I mean in an information war, when the truth about 9/11 has not been declassified or revealed, a President kind of has to go along with the official narrative.
Neutral isn’t quite the right word as I don’t mean neutral like “no opinion” but more like, “No shift from the mainstream narrative consensus.” Obviously the mainstream narrative consensus is not itself neutral but I think, to an extent, the comparison to 9/11 makes sense. As President, Trump would know about Building 7, the Bushes, Mossad, etc. But then when he delivers a commemorative speech about 9/11, he follows the mainstream “official” narrative. Is that lying? Well - yeah. But I also know what a tactical error it would be for him, at that time, to start going off on, “This was an inside job, the U.S. government was behind this, dancing Israelis!” I mean in an information war, when the truth about 9/11 has not been declassified or revealed, a President kind of has to go along with the official narrative.