A few years ago, I caught California's income tax agency overcharging taxpayers. I complained to my elected officials and Deep State employees, who told me the State will only stop overcharging if a judge orders them to. I can't afford a lawyer, so I filed a lawsuit acting as my own attorney.
Through my case, I have already gotten proof that their internal accounting ledgers are falsified to hide the overcharges. I have asked the judge to order the State to disclose the policies and procedures that led to the accounting irregularities. He makes his tentative ruling in writing on Thursday, and on Friday, we go to court to argue the matter. After the arguments, the ruling will stand or be changed based on how well we argue. If I lose, I may be penalized $6,000 for even asking for the information in the first place.
There is a lot riding on this hearing. I basically already have the body and the bullet, and I am requesting that the judge order them to hand over the smoking gun. If I win, the information exposed could be huge in the government corruption fight. If I lose, it might cost me $6k as a punishment for trying to expose the corruption.
I feel like I am being spiritually attacked hard. Please pray that:
- God protect me and my family (they are retaliatory harassing us)
- That I am focused and have energy as I prepare for my hearing
- That the judge rules in my favor
- That my oral arguments are good and theirs are not
- That, if I win, the State complies and turns over the information
Not that I'm aware of.
They argued they should not be required to disclose their policies and procedures? What?!? Remind them who they work for. They're accountable TO THE PEOPLE.
I did! In my Brief, I wrote: "Given that one of FTB’s published foundational principles is to “Operate with transparency to maintain public trust and confidence,” it seems to me that FTB should be eager to disclose their policies and procedures. I believe this information should be readily available online and it should not be necessary for a judge to order them to disclose such basic information."
Here is another thing of interest that I wrote in my Reply to her Opposition: "In her Opposition, Ms. Barsegyan stated that defendant failed to properly respond to the interrogatories because they were unable to understand my questions. I believe that Your Honor will agree that the questions were clear and straight forward, especially when I rephrased them in the Meet and Confer. There is no reason for FTB to have not understood questions as simple as 5A, “Please define what exactly ‘timely’ means.” I found it interesting that Ms. Barsegyan specifically requested that Your Honor not compel the answer to this fundamental question, and used a false pretense to justify this request."
Bases covered? Check.
(It all depends on what the definition of "timely" is. Where have we heard something like this before? Kek.)