I'm on board with Q, The Plan, etc (though I do get down from time to time) but it absolutely is very nice to have the reassurance I'm not nuts.
I'm constantly looking for new / more data points, constantly trying to prove / disprove myself, constantly testing my theories and knowledge, so it is really huge for me that Patel is NOT a Q guy.....massive....
Yes I know Wictor isn't; he certainly makes NO bones about it.
That entire QV forum (Kek) where he posts; any mention of Q that isn't totally negative; if you aren't a vehement Q-basher, you get pretty much instantly banned from there, from what I gather.
So again; quite a few relatively sharp people on QV, and it's been very reassuring to me to know that they hate Q.
What does it tell you when a group of smart people reach the exact same conclusions as we do, but not only using an entirely different data set, but they outright think our data (Q drops) are total BS?
Yes, exactly!!!
I'm on board with Q, The Plan, etc (though I do get down from time to time) but it absolutely is very nice to have the reassurance I'm not nuts.
I'm constantly looking for new / more data points, constantly trying to prove / disprove myself, constantly testing my theories and knowledge, so it is really huge for me that Patel is NOT a Q guy.....massive....
Yes I know Wictor isn't; he certainly makes NO bones about it. That entire QV forum (Kek) where he posts; any mention of Q that isn't totally negative; if you aren't a vehement Q-basher, you get pretty much instantly banned from there, from what I gather.
So again; quite a few relatively sharp people on QV, and it's been very reassuring to me to know that they hate Q.
What does it tell you when a group of smart people reach the exact same conclusions as we do, but not only using an entirely different data set, but they outright think our data (Q drops) are total BS?
Must really irk them, actually.... 😁😁😁