Let's explore what happens if 98% of vax recipients (or more) are actually getting injected with only saline.
They get compliance, because the death/injury rate is artificially very low (less resistance).
They get large-scale test results, because they know who actually got the vax.
(This is the big one) --> In order to maximize societal and business disruption, the death/injury rate should be at a certain 'sweet spot' (just high enough to warn those that are awake, but low enough to keep the brainwashed masses asleep). If they add/reduce saline to artificially stay at that 'sweet spot', they create two (somewhat) equal camps -- continuously at war with one another.
Note: Once they get compliance, the booster program lets them 'finish off' the plan at any time they choose - (just stop giving out saline).
They may (or may not) be doing this, but it makes for a 'perfect evil plan'.
I didn't suggest I knew the exact percentage breakdown. It could be 98%, 95%, 90% or whatever. The idea is that there is enough harm to create (some) resistance, but not enough harm to awaken too many sheep.
Again - either theory can account for what we are seeing.
Good grief, Bill. I've said multiple times that either theory can explain what we're seeing - and you want to claim that I don't understand the concept of 'delayed' harm?
I said in the original post that they may or may not be doing what I proposed, but there is simply no mathematical way to disprove my theory.
If 'bad guys' had sufficient supplies of 'kill vax', 'weak vax', and saline - they could cause any distribution of harm that they wanted.
They could fine tune the dose distribution to make the vax look perfectly harmless, or completely deadly. And if they wanted it to simulate a 1:1 placebo trial, they easily could do that as well. Tell me what distribution of death, SAEs, and AEs that you want to show - and a high-school algebra student can tell you what the ratio of doses needs to be.
If you can't accept that it is mathematically possible, then you are either being disingenuous, or you have no idea how math works. (But of course, we know your true motivation - it's rather obvious from your comment history.)
Either way, this is my last response to you. Go ahead, have the last word...
You win - your idiocy got me to respond.
It's not a 'saline in the vax' idea, you idiot, it's a distribution of 'saline-only shots' and 'vax-only shots' (with a possible third option of 'weak-vax shots').
Read.