45
posted ago by AlgorithmicFairness ago by AlgorithmicFairness +45 / -0

No doubt much of the anti-Trump hysteria was 'real' (well, it was real to them, informed by much by delusions). But I wondered if a percentage of the prominent anti-Trumpers spent that era creating credibility with the left so that they couldn't be thrown under the bus/called Trumpers when their role in the plan came due - to go on TV and do their part in cementing some new narrative or turning the tide at a crucial moment. The true Trumpers will never be listened to, but if you get, idk, Eric Swalwell or Adam Schiff or some less loathesome figure like a Jeff Flake or your garden variety RINO backing a storm narrative at a key moment...well you get it.

The Baldwin thing got me thinking, considering Darryl Hammond always played the best Trump, but Baldwin ended up doing a very bad and very deranged one for four years straight - his anti-Trump bona fides were cemented with all of America - idk but I consider Baldwin smarter than the type of work he was doing. If Baldwin was implicated in some minor way via Epstein, he could have been used as a pawn all along. Now you get this weird event that seems like a signal to us/psy-op.

If what we believe is true, there must be innumerable agents who have been turned, as well as actual patriots, who are working a very sophisticated game.

I'm sure many are thinking the same thing.