I mean we know that the MSM doesn't tell us anything without an ulterior motive. Why are they pushing this empty shelves and inflation narrative so hard? They're not doing this to inform the public. Just like with their COVID fear mongering, they are trying to scare us into making their narrative a reality. But why? Qui Bono?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
A very good question.
If plotter's of a plan they are carrying out, a distraction is a very good way of protecting their plan.
We know the Great Reset is their end game. The United States Dollar is the reserve currency to the rest of the world. We also know from their own admissions (World Bank, IMF, Federal Reserve Chairs) that China's Renminbi is planned to be the replacement for the United States as the reserve currency of the world.
As they say-- 'The old must be destroyed to bring in the new'. This is actually what they are attempting to do and means the United States' economy must be destroyed. As a result, foreign currencies pegged to the Dollar will fall as well.
The Plandemic and its lock-downs is the mechanism being used to destroy the United States economy. The Clot Shot is being used as a soft kill to depopulate the working class so businesses and manufacturing cannot function.
The firing of the Clot Shot 'resisters' is part of this. However, more people are waking up and there is momentum that this is picking up. More people are saying-- 'F* Yu and are increasingly not taking the shot. The empty shelves narrative is being used as a distraction to all of this. They are desperately trying to prevent people finding out how deadly this bio-weapon actually is and don't want the momentum picking up. The Clot Shot mandate is the most important weapon in their arsenal. Without the Emergency, they lose.
So is this supply chain issue and shortages what they will use to explain away a potential hyperinflation and/or depression environment? To destroy the US dollar as a reserve currency? I agree that they do have to destroy the US dollar for their to be a Great Reset.
I also wonder about Bitcoin. I don't know what to make of it. So many people think it's monetary "freedom". I wonder if it's a bait and switch. I mean who is this Satoshi that created the idea of Bitcoin right after the 08-09 crash? If I were a nefarious group, I dunno like say the CIA, I would create this idea of a digital currency from an anonymous source -- use my media puppets to propagandize it to the masses -- use these digital profits to fund illegal intelligence activities throughout the world -- use it to extract the wealth from the unsuspecting hard workers taking advantage of their desire for freedom -- and then once my goal is achieved, boom, bring it all crashing down so fast that the serfs won't know what hit them. I mean it would be a rather brilliant CIA op, no?
The narrative from the MSM is going to be fear. The supply chain issue may be what Brian Cates explanation of it is. If you haven't already read these short pieces, see Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4. In Part 3, a PEAD are Presidential Emergency Action Documents. The supply chain for food is also being affected by the government's 'Environmental' policy and CA farmer's are burning their crops instead of paying for the high water prices.
I read somewhere that a CEO said Bitcoin was owned by Soros. Here it is.. I don't know if it's true or not, but I don't like digital currency and I stay away from it. To me it's 'vaporware'.
I have always been suspect of Bitcoin. Esp when all the big banks and hedgies started piling on. If one world currency is what they want then that would be Bitcoin.
Even if it was not nefarious, how is something going to have value if there are ten billion different types of coins?
Sort of wrong way of thinking. The idea of digital gold has been around for a long time, Satoshi was just able to put it all together into an actionable system.
What is digital gold?
What is the purpose of it?
What is Bitcoin? (Alternatively, what is cryptocurrency?)
Who benefits from it?
Who loses from it?
Who or what is Blockstream?
When did Blockstream get the keys (to what?)?
What does that access allow you to control?
How was Bitcoin strangled?
When did the banks go from against to then shilling to the moon?
What is a digital asset (in the context of cryptocurrency)?
Why is crypto treated more as a stock than as means of exchange?
What is Tether?
Who holds Tether accountable for their backings?
What is the Federal Reserve?
Who holds the Fed accountable for their backings?
No, those agencies didn't create Bitcoin and spawn this movement, but you can sure as hell bet they're doing their darnedest to sabotage and control it. They didn't create it, they constantly tried to downplay it early on and then when they slithered into control, then, and only then did they start pushing it, and crippling it at the same time.
There's a lot of cool crypto projects out there, but there are also a lot of scams and or pointless projects.
Look at Bitcoin Cash. Look at Monero. What are they? CASH. MONEY. GOLD. There are probably more, but these two projects seek to give the sovereignty of money back to the individual.
There's three scenarios that are most likely for the future of money, two of them involving crypto (real currency not some amalgamation).
Precious metals are valuable, and will still be important for wealth building and security, but you cannot send silver or gold to make purchases across the world on the internet so that you can buy mugs and tshirts.
tl;dr Bitcoin (among many other cryptocurrencies) is (most likely) not the creation of any government agency, rather, the creation of an individual or group of individuals outside of government influence, who sought to give financial sovereignty back to the people after witnessing the corruption in the system for themselves. However, after a certain point and due to a certain series of events in Bitcoin's history, the powers that be have essentially hijacked the narative and are left unchecked as they continue to steal all value from the private individual to further enrich themselves.
No need to create when you can just buy the right people off and hijack the project a la Trojan Horse.