That’s true but that chap said that makeup is what made the difference. Whereas there are actually skeletal differences such as a brow ridge, angular mandible, broader shoulders, narrower pelvis and longer limbs in males.
If you believe in biological facts then you just can’t dispute that there are biological differences.
If you are going to support an argument that there are no biological, as in skeletal, differences then you are well on your way to being co-opted by the trans acceptance folk.
I believe what I know to be true. And the proof is all around me. That there are general biological differences does not change the fact that 1) women do not all look alike and 2) many women have masculine features. I've known more women than I can count who looked as such. Perhaps to some degree even myself with my athletic build and a face that would never earn the adjective soft nor delicate. It's not debatable, bud
So now you've moved from facial features to pelvis. So what? I may have a broader pelvis but have an athletic slender build with no hips. You sound like a kid with little in the way of actual life experience. Dude, you're assumptions are wrong. Accept it
Plenty of women have masculine features as plenty of men have feminine features. What are you smoking?
That’s true but that chap said that makeup is what made the difference. Whereas there are actually skeletal differences such as a brow ridge, angular mandible, broader shoulders, narrower pelvis and longer limbs in males.
If you believe in biological facts then you just can’t dispute that there are biological differences.
If you are going to support an argument that there are no biological, as in skeletal, differences then you are well on your way to being co-opted by the trans acceptance folk.
I believe what I know to be true. And the proof is all around me. That there are general biological differences does not change the fact that 1) women do not all look alike and 2) many women have masculine features. I've known more women than I can count who looked as such. Perhaps to some degree even myself with my athletic build and a face that would never earn the adjective soft nor delicate. It's not debatable, bud
I agree that some women have masculine features but every woman has a broader pelvis than their male counterparts.
Facts which cannot be denied and cannot be ignored.
Biology matters.
So now you've moved from facial features to pelvis. So what? I may have a broader pelvis but have an athletic slender build with no hips. You sound like a kid with little in the way of actual life experience. Dude, you're assumptions are wrong. Accept it