Perhaps we both interpreted the headline and article differently. The article doesn't make reference to this book being used in schools. It's mainly about the publisher's right to publish, under Russian law.

I agree that children shouldn't be fed this crap. After what we've been through, though, I hope you can understand why I might be hesitant to support direct censorship rather than removing this material from schools. Nevertheless, there may be more context to this that the article doesn't provide (in particular, it didn't really explain the law itself), and in general the push against the globohomo agenda is a welcome sight.