Correct. Jesus did not green light the consumption of pork. He was emphasizing that someone eating pork is not as bad as someone spewing vitriol in His Name. Other people like to quote Peter's dream as though it was a green light and even that does not hold up to scrutiny.
God specifically named what animals can be consumed. And researching the effects of long term pork use isn't that hard, yet people don't want to because it means having to give up pork despite the fact that ALL of the alternatives are better in every single way.
When they argue Jesus made it legal, they inaccurate comprehension of the scriptures. We have health laws for a reason.
I have not eaten pork for years.
Correct. Jesus did not green light the consumption of pork. He was emphasizing that someone eating pork is not as bad as someone spewing vitriol in His Name. Other people like to quote Peter's dream as though it was a green light and even that does not hold up to scrutiny.
God specifically named what animals can be consumed. And researching the effects of long term pork use isn't that hard, yet people don't want to because it means having to give up pork despite the fact that ALL of the alternatives are better in every single way.
Thank you. True