I had to do a double take on that too. Who TF is going to read thousands of pages of what is likely highly technical analytical data arguments?

SOMEBODY somewhere in the movement to correct the most obvious case of cheating and vote theft in history, needs to learn HOW TO COMMUNICATE.

Simple example:

1."This is what happened."

2. "Here is the proof."

3. Hand them a simple summary AND THE THOUSANDS OF PAGES of proof.

If they decide they want to rebut your conclusion, it is then their responsibility to read it carefully.

It's as simple as child's play, but NOBODY in the movement seems to understand how to communicate.