320 () posted 3 years ago by BQnita 3 years ago by BQnita +320 / -0 29 comments share 29 comments share save hide report block hide replies
600 x 22 = 13,200 pages.
I had to do a double take on that too. Who TF is going to read thousands of pages of what is likely highly technical analytical data arguments?
SOMEBODY somewhere in the movement to correct the most obvious case of cheating and vote theft in history, needs to learn HOW TO COMMUNICATE.
Simple example:
1."This is what happened."
"Here is the proof."
Hand them a simple summary AND THE THOUSANDS OF PAGES of proof.
If they decide they want to rebut your conclusion, it is then their responsibility to read it carefully.
It's as simple as child's play, but NOBODY in the movement seems to understand how to communicate.
Let's hope the 13,200 pages does have the summary, just as you described.
By the time the senate reads 13,200 pages the cows in my area will have literally come home...There's got to be a summary page somewhere!
It'll be like the Nancy Pelosi Budgets... "We have to pass the budget to see what is in it."
Or a more recent example, the fda saying, "we have to give people the vaccine to see if it is safe."
13,200 pages can be a run of the mill Pelosi bill.