The error in your post is not in its content but in the context that you made it. What you said is true in a certain context but in this context it comes off as supportive of promiscuity and sexual degeneracy.
It's clear to me you are making a general comment on human sexuality and the Bible with a side criticism of the Roman Catholic Church but to others it almost looks like you are endorsing or at least are excusing the actions of a degenerate woman who engaged in lesbian sexual activities for money.
Just a suggestion, consider how your poat will be perceived based on where you post it.
Thats why i didnt go too much into it, its complex. And has a strange history, I also come from a place where the spirit of religion is not the spirit of Christ. It goes me>Christ>God. not me>gatekeeper (preacher or pope) arbitur if truth> Jesus>God
The error in your post is not in its content but in the context that you made it. What you said is true in a certain context but in this context it comes off as supportive of promiscuity and sexual degeneracy.
It's clear to me you are making a general comment on human sexuality and the Bible with a side criticism of the Roman Catholic Church but to others it almost looks like you are endorsing or at least are excusing the actions of a degenerate woman who engaged in lesbian sexual activities for money.
Just a suggestion, consider how your poat will be perceived based on where you post it.
Thats why i didnt go too much into it, its complex. And has a strange history, I also come from a place where the spirit of religion is not the spirit of Christ. It goes me>Christ>God. not me>gatekeeper (preacher or pope) arbitur if truth> Jesus>God
But it is you->Christ->Father. It's not you->pope/pastor/Mary->Christ->Father.
We go direct to Christ and direct to the Father. The Lord's prayer shows us how.