The vaccine is a weapon of war.
Those who have to take it against their preference are casualties.
Brothers wounded in war get Purple Hearts.
They don’t get ostracized.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
If that's true, then my immune system is now around 100% weaker than it was when I got the initial vaccine.
I will let you know if I get sick, but I and my coworkers who were vaccinated with me back in January have been fine so far.
I've talked about this quite frequently that VAERS data cannot cannot cannot be used to make these types of inferences, because VAERS data both REQUIRES reporting of cases that are unlikely to be related to the vaccine, AND cases are not in any way vetted before being posted to VAERS. It's designed as a resource for medical researchers to focus in on very specific areas, and doesn't actually prove that even a single person died from the vaccine. There could be absolutely ZERO deaths from the vaccine, and VAERS would look exactly the way it does today.
VAERS data is available to the public so that all researchers have access to it, but that doesn't mean its data is curated or usable by laypeople.
I'd encourage you to read the how-to page on the VAERS website itself to see these limitations and why the type of conclusions that people like Peters draw simply cannot be supported based on how VAERS itself says it works.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Hey! We found a glowie!
You’re welcome to interpret it that way, but you’re still using a basic assumption that VAERS isn’t supporting.
That’s like me assuming that if the number of asteroids that crash through houses is underreported, then there must be millions of asteroids crashing through houses and asteroids are a significant threat to homeowners.
I can assume that based on under reporting to the asteroid-house-collision database, but I’m still assuming that asteroids regularly crash into houses to reach that conclusion.