I have lurked here for about a year and thought to post my first question to attorneys that lurk on this site.
My question and just a thought. If the Covid-19 vaccine EAU only exists because no effective treatment is available. However, we have case studies from India and Japan also South American of ivermetcin and HCQ being given in place of the vaccine and whiping the virus almost out of existence? We have evidence of massive vaccine injuries and presidented past vaccine studies that were terminated because of adverse effects and deaths. So why has no lawyer(s) or law firm(s) working together challenge the FDA's EAU of these vaccines? Get rid of the EAU, no mandates, and I believe, possibly, the liability shield for the manufacturers is lifted.
There is no FDA-approved vaccine available in the U.S. Only Comirnaty is FDA-approved and it won't be available here until 2023. Wouldn't forcing someone to take a vaccine that you (your company, our government) told employees was approved but was NOT, invalidate any liability exclusions? I think our law profession will be kept busy until the Second Coming with lawsuits resulting from these lies.