Once the work arounds and coercion for the EUA “vaccine” started I knew the rule of law went out the window. I can’t believe there was state sponsored lotteries tied to getting the jab.
Any thoughts on the fact that by mandating this regardless of occupation that by definition, with no consideration to occupation, makes it NOT an occupational hazard. Similar to the fact that catching the cold or flu is not a work related exposure but contracting tuberculosis on a work trip is (and even then the tb vaccine isn’t mandated)
Unfortunately, a state of emergency allows the government a lot of latitudes that usually are only rolled back later by the courts. This point cannot be emphasized enough. Although they take time to work through the system, lawsuits are the only way that an average citizen can force change where a political solution is doubtful.
Well written, thank you.
Once the work arounds and coercion for the EUA “vaccine” started I knew the rule of law went out the window. I can’t believe there was state sponsored lotteries tied to getting the jab.
Any thoughts on the fact that by mandating this regardless of occupation that by definition, with no consideration to occupation, makes it NOT an occupational hazard. Similar to the fact that catching the cold or flu is not a work related exposure but contracting tuberculosis on a work trip is (and even then the tb vaccine isn’t mandated)
Unfortunately, a state of emergency allows the government a lot of latitudes that usually are only rolled back later by the courts. This point cannot be emphasized enough. Although they take time to work through the system, lawsuits are the only way that an average citizen can force change where a political solution is doubtful.