The nation's unvaccinated workers face grave danger from workplace exposure to coronavirus

It is all based on fraud.

Page 121:

This ETS will preempt inconsistent state and local requirements

Umm ... no. OSHA has no authority to preempt state and local anything.

And:

Although the ETS does not require all covered employers to implement a mandatory vaccination policy, OSHA expects that employers that choose that compliance option will enjoy advantages that employers that opt out of the vaccination mandate option will not. Most obviously, employers with a mandatory vaccination policy will enjoy a dramatically reduced risk that their employees will become severely ill or die of a COVID-19 infection.

Lies. All based on fraud, of course.

There is NO CORRELATION between vaccination rate and Covid cases, per the NIH:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/

Page 13:

The Secretary must issue an ETS in situations where employees are exposed to a “grave danger” and immediate action is necessary to protect those employees from such danger

There is NO "grave danger." Other than the tyranny.

Although the findings of grave danger and necessity must be based on evidence of “actual, prevailing industrial conditions,” ... when OSHA determines that exposure to a particular hazard would pose a grave danger to workers, OSHA can assume an exposure to a grave danger wherever that hazard is present in a workplace.

Not if it is based on FRAUD.

Page 62:

Based on the information discussed above, OSHA finds that many unvaccinated workers across the U.S. economy are facing a grave danger of severe health effects or death from exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Fully vaccinated workers are not included in this grave danger finding because, as described throughout this section, those who are fully vaccinated are much better protected from the effects of SARS-CoV-2 and, in particular, the most severe effects, than are those who are unvaccinated

More fraud.

The document uses the term "covered employer" to claim that these businesses must do something. But, the term "covered employer" is nowhere defined, which means it does not actually apply to anyone.