.....
In testimony 11.04.21
1:38:50
"Our vaccine adverse event system collects all deaths after vaccination that means if you were hit in a motor vehicle accident and succumb to that event that would be reported in our vaccine safety system, clearly that is not a causal effect from a vaccine."
She then switches back to vaccine push.
Is this something new?
Question. Why would any event other than an adverse event directly attributable to a given vaccine be reported at all?
She says it herself that this would not be a causal effect from a vaccine. So why is it being put on the list.
You can't have it both ways.
Is she trying to convince us that the vaers numbers are wrong because it includes all deaths of all causes after vaccination?
"Adverse Event."
If I fall out of a twenty story window is that an adverse event?
They are trying to cover.
Thanks for reading.
.....
There are reports in VAERS that do not appear to be deaths from the vaccine. They aren't many, but they exist. VAERS allows for such reports. But to say:
is a complete and total lie within context. The proper way she should have said it is:
The first implies that VAERS catches all deaths of vaccinated persons. It doesn't even come close. VAERS is voluntary.
And I mean, OF COURSE it doesn't do that, How many vaccinated people have died in the U.S. since vaccines started? Are there only the 15k or whatever is on VAERS? It would have to catch ALL vaccinated peoples deaths for what she is implying to be true. She purposefully used a contextual lie to suggest that VAERS isn't really showing deaths from a vaccine.
For COVID death data however,
is absolutely correct. COVID deaths are required to be reported with a COVID diagnosis attached if they tested positive at any point regardless of the actual cause of death.