Question, What is the legal requirement regarding the reporting of vaccine related adverse events by any of those that administer them?

posted 3 years ago by Nightcereus 3 years ago by Nightcereus +26 / -0

.....

If a doctor, nurse or pharmacist etc. gives a vaccine to someone and that person has a bad reaction are they legally required to report it properly and truthfully? I believe the answer is yes.

This seems like an important aspect in all of this vax nonsense.

.....

If health care professionals are reporting adverse effects and injuries it means that they are aware of the potential problems but continue to administer more shots anyway.

Or,

If they have had patients that have experienced adverse effects or injuries and failed to report them they are covering up the problems.

.....

Either way they are directly responsible for any further injuries that occur.

So, if there is a legal requirement to report such events this opens a door for us to ask, 'how many adverse reactions have you reported?'

'Are you informing your patients of the possible risks?'

'How can you continue, knowing the dangers?'

.....

Seems like a strong, useful argument.

Thank you for reading.

.....

7 comments

7 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (7)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Slyver 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

There is no legal requirement for reporting vaccine injury, it is a completely voluntary system.
If doctors report vaccine injury they are potentially complicit in that injury, especially if it happens often. They are thus incentivized to not report to VAERS.
Doctors are trained to believe that Big Pharma is telling the truth. Doctors rely on them for their information on drugs. They are not trained to rely on follow up independent experiments.
If many patients die due to the actions and beliefs of a doctor, that doctor will experience cognitive dissonance. To rectify that discord they will either allow within their mind that the vaccine caused the damage, or something else did. If it is something else, they are off the hook, thus they are more likely to choose that "other explanation." (Like a Pandemic). This path of Cognitive dissonance rectification is also an incentive to not report to VAERS.
If doctors go against Big Pharma they can lose their job. They must be certified by the AMA to continue to practice medicine. Big Pharma and the AMA are owned by the same people.

Conclusion: VAERS reports (or a lack thereof) do not provide a legal path to prove doctor complicity. Doctors must be shown the truth just like the rest of us. The medical establishment is a major front in the war to end all wars. It is just as much of a wide open gate as government, economics, and I think soon to be religion, in the Great Awakening.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Nightcereus [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Thank you.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q