Prosecutor: "You don't know, as you are sitting here today, what Mr. Rosenbaum was thinking, do you?"
Richard McGinniss: "Do you mean at the time of the shooting?"
Prosecutor: "Yes".... "Or at any time in his life." You have no idea...what Mr. Rosenbaum was ever thinking"
Richard McGinniss: "I never exchanged words with him, if that's what your question is."
Prosecutor: "So your interpretation of what he was trying to do, or intending to do, or anything along those lines was complete guess work...Isn't it?"
Richard McGinniss: "...Well, he said 'fuck you' and then reached for [his] weapon."
BOOOOOOOOMMMM!!!!!!* This has to be the greatest reply I've heard in such a long time.
Well, he said 'fuck you' and then reached for [his] weapon."
You can't make this shit up. It is so fantastic.
Yea, I'm hearing that.... But, why would the journalist be asked these types of questions?
He was standing a few feet away and was a witness.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/juror-dismissed-rittenhouse-trial-joke-about-jacob-blake-shooting-2021-11-04/
Because he was a witness.
Yea, many others have made this known to me. It is still a really great answer though. Too bad it wasn't Kyle Rittenhouse himself. I was only able to listen to cuts of this. It was indeed a journalist who was being cross examined by the prosecutor. One has to admit the questioning is as if it was Kyle Rittenhouse himself. Why the prosecutor ask if the witness questions like this? It completely fooled me in believing it had to be Kyle himself answering this.
The witness has probably completed multiple private depositions where the low paid overworked criminal prosecution interns summarized his deposition as " witness says pedophile guy had an ill intention towards Rittenhouse". This lawyer is trying to show that witness has no way of knowing pedophiles intention with hilarious results. This attorney did not do his homework and it shows.
You're giving too much credit to the prosecutor. They have a bottomless access to tax payer money. It is the defense that is strapped to limited funds. In the end, you are correct in the obviousness of this case. Self defense... I can't think of any better example of it.