Was watching Elijah Schaffer on the You are Here show on You Tube Link and around 6 mins in the Brandon dude was saying that Q people think JFK jr is alive.
I remember Q answered someones question when directly asked about it and said that Jr is not alive. Point Blank.
So wtf is going on? Sounds like some Q people don't follow along enough to know that Q said that, but also that the people making fun of Q followers also don't know that Q said that.
Becomes an easy way to straw man the whole conversation
A lot of people have suggested that JFK jr is still alive. Much of it is based on videos of Trump rallies and on photos such as this:
https://files.catbox.moe/hsuvhb.jpg
Those people look VERY much like older versions of John John and Carolyn and people have even done facial matching with image software.
But body doubles are everywhere so it might be true or it might be a "flat earth" type operation to make us look stupid.
I'm keeping an open mind. I simply don't know.
It's funny, you saying you're "keeping an open mind" on the JFK jr being alive after calling flat earth stupid. Q said he's dead. I still think he may be alive because I've looked into all the info on the supposed death by plane crash. Q literally said to question EVERYTHING. The shape of the earth and whether it moves or is stationary, whether the sun and moon are as far away as they say, whether planets are, and look like what they say, etc would fall into the category of EVERYTHING. [they] desperately want us to believe we live on an insignificant spinning ball being thrown through an ever-expanding universe. You all trust that 'science' huh? Just like the 'science' of evolution (bogus) and the 'science' of multi-genders and the science of 'viruses' etc. etc. Meanwhile [they] re-write history at their own discretion, and hide whatever they wish to. [They] want US to believe we are nothing special and our planet is an insignificant speck that happened by CHANCE from some random BIG BANG. Being "open-minded while NOT questioning EVERYTHING is impossible, kind of like 200 genders.
BOOYAH.....THIS 100%
Not true. You sound like a lefty. If you think a spinning wet ball flying through space after a random big bang is a "working model" then YOU are the one who is "retarded" literally. You're thinking is limited to what you've been trained since childhood to believe without question.
You provide a good observation. Also, Polarus doesn't move because it lies in a really, really long isoceles triangle away from us. Our Earth's orbit around the Sun, from one end to the other makes the length of the base, and the two legs make a nearly 90° angle from our orbit to reach Polarus. The third angle at Polarus is practically 0°, hence why Polarus appears to be stationary as of now.
It would actually be nice for people to research the topic and have a discussion about it but the topic is immediately shut down. We acn talk about the possibility of dead people faking their death, aliens, demons, even lizard people but as soon as someone questions the globe model of the earth(that has existed a short time) a person is called "retarded". Seems like people are scared to discuss it rationally.
I don't want to bother arguing the evidence of why it's a globe or why it's not. I just want to say many people on this board are very open minded. I can't speak for everyone, but I at least looked into flat earth. I wanted to prove the globe theory wrong, but I couldn't. Instead I kept debunking flat earth.
One simple thing I always look at is how can any amateur with a good telescope look up, and see how the other planets in our solar system are without a doubt spinning spheroids. We have high tech cameras pointed at the sun all the time, we can see solar flares coming off a giant spherical sun, yet the earth is somehow flat?
It's difficult to have a conversation about the shape of the earth with humility as a prevailing trait.
I like to start by establishing something both sides should be able to agree on. Most Earth Curve calculators on the web return the same results within a very small margin.
Here I think is one of the most accurate ones ...
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=30&h0=10&unit=imperial
... and here is the documentation of the source code used in the calculations (from M.I.T) ...
https://github.com/dizzib/earthcalc
If someone is unwilling to acknowledge the accuracy of this formula then IMO they've demonstrated their mind is closed. You and I both know the big "problem" is that in the modern world there is technology within the financial reach of average citizens to observe the shape of the earth over a body of water that previously was only within the financial reach of governments and major universities.
This topic is really not as unobtainably complicated as many would have us believe.