To be honest I'm confused by the data. Can someone explain how they're analyzing the information?
Table from ~page 13 of 33 on the different reports.
Ex:
Weeks 32-35. age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 672.3
Weeks 33-36. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 699.5
Weeks 34-37. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 661.2
So why does weeks 34-37 have a -34.6% immune system degradation and -2.9% weekly decline, if it's a lower number than the rate prior (from 699.5-661.2)?
To be honest I'm confused by the data. Can someone explain how they're analyzing the information?
Table from ~page 13 of 33 on the different reports.
Ex:
Weeks 32-35. age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 672.3
Weeks 33-36. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 699.5
Weeks 34-37. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 661.2
So why does weeks 34-37 have a -34.6% immune system degradation and -2.9% weekly decline, if it's a lower number than the rate prior (from 699.5-661.2)?