Be careful there mate..... that article is referencing data from Public Health England (PHE) and is based on a very limited sample which the author has then extrapolated to reach those published figures.....
The conclusions there are not verified so remember to caveat this if you decide to tell someone about this.....
To be honest I'm confused by the data. Can someone explain how they're analyzing the information?
Table from ~page 13 of 33 on the different reports.
Ex:
Weeks 32-35. age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 672.3
Weeks 33-36. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 699.5
Weeks 34-37. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 661.2
So why does weeks 34-37 have a -34.6% immune system degradation and -2.9% weekly decline, if it's a lower number than the rate prior (from 699.5-661.2)?
I actually think that they just don't want blood/plasma from vaccine induced antibodies, they want the real thing from natural immunity. Just like hemoglobin from measles, etc. Why would they want vaccine induced antibodies, (if there is such a thing.
This is my read on it as well. There’s a much greater range of antigenic targets with natural antibodies than just the RBD of the spike protein produced from the vax.
Additionally- convalescent plasma doesn’t really seem to be an effective treatment for covid, so I think they halted this policy already anyways.
Dr. Peter McCullough said the vaxxed spike proteins stay in the body for up to 15 months (but that's from only one dose, who know how long with more doses). In that time, its seems they are recommending boosters every 5-6 months. So you'll be royally screwed.
I wanna know for those vaxxed, does it wipe out the natural immunity their bodies developed for ever or just long enough to get the booster.
A comparison of official Government reports suggest the Fully Vaccinated are developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome - AIDS
Ooohhhhh this is grade A ammo.
Be careful there mate..... that article is referencing data from Public Health England (PHE) and is based on a very limited sample which the author has then extrapolated to reach those published figures.....
The conclusions there are not verified so remember to caveat this if you decide to tell someone about this.....
WWG1WGA
But muh confirmation bias tho
To be honest I'm confused by the data. Can someone explain how they're analyzing the information?
Table from ~page 13 of 33 on the different reports.
Ex:
Weeks 32-35. age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 672.3
Weeks 33-36. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 699.5
Weeks 34-37. Age 60-69. Rate per 100k in double vaxxed (per 100k) = 661.2
So why does weeks 34-37 have a -34.6% immune system degradation and -2.9% weekly decline, if it's a lower number than the rate prior (from 699.5-661.2)?
I actually think that they just don't want blood/plasma from vaccine induced antibodies, they want the real thing from natural immunity. Just like hemoglobin from measles, etc. Why would they want vaccine induced antibodies, (if there is such a thing.
This is my read on it as well. There’s a much greater range of antigenic targets with natural antibodies than just the RBD of the spike protein produced from the vax. Additionally- convalescent plasma doesn’t really seem to be an effective treatment for covid, so I think they halted this policy already anyways.
Dr. Peter McCullough said the vaxxed spike proteins stay in the body for up to 15 months (but that's from only one dose, who know how long with more doses). In that time, its seems they are recommending boosters every 5-6 months. So you'll be royally screwed.