The Rittenhouse trial could destroy the social revolution of the radical left
(thelibertyloft.com)
Comments (6)
sorted by:
The response of social media losing their damned minds is doing that exact thing before the decision is even made.
It's honestly hilarious to watch them. It's like "they never thought she'd lose" all over again. They really didn't. And now it's "they never thought he'd walk." He will, I'm sure of that. And it'll break the minds of libs all over the country.
We really do live in a parallel reality. I personally know many people rooting against Kyle. The only difference between us & them is that we have context to the character of those individuals who Kyle shot. They're fucking awful people. If you leave that part out, as MSM deliberately does, then it is easy to paint a picture where Kyle is out for blood. But the minute you have actual, truthful context to his actions--FULL context--then suddenly the atory shifts dramatically.
I believe Kyle will be found innocent. I believe that corrupt dems will take to the streets and break shit over the verdict, like the tolerant people they are. And then, one day, they'll all feel really stupid when they realize what we have known all along: Kyle Rittenhouse didn't go out of his way to murder "innocent protestors." He acted in self defensr and shot a complete waste of skin pedophile, a violent abuser & felon, and a man with a gun who was about to shoot him.
Bitter pills for the left. If Kyle were a woke Democrat they'd have been honest about the "victims" from day 1, and would have celebrated Kyle from day 1. "Brave BLM/antifa protestor visiting from out of state protects self against extremists." But they're not gonna get his vote so they don't give a fuck about his life, or the truth. It"s pathetic, but unsurprising.
If the judge dismisses the case with prejudice it will be exactly what the prosecution wants, because the left will say the judge was a white supremisist and didn't let the trial come to an end because Kyle would have lost.
wait for the jury to come to a verdict, than, regardless of that that verdict is, declare a mistrial with prejudice. than bring charges of contempt of court against the prosecutor for introducing evidence that was already ruled inadmissible (literally contempt of the court's decision).
This is what I lean towards seeing happen. I've had a feeling mistrial would come up from the getgo. Would be interesting to see how they spin things if that's what happens
This jury should have been sequestered.