I found a series of photos of Harry throughout the years. Note that there are odd gaps in the progression of photos. There's one where he's with Diana at a waterpark when he should be 8, then it jumps ahead a couple years for the next photo.
I have to wonder, though, if we haven't been fed some disinformation on this. I've seen a couple of pics of Harry in his teens that just don't jive. Look at the 2001 photo. Note that it is a 3 year jump from the prior photo. The 2001 shot doesn't look like the current Harry at all. And, check this one out:
I can't get to the actual file at the moment, but I think he was 12?? in this photo.
"This is meant to be the father, he's had a rough old time by the looks of things, lots in the media about him"
Wow, he looks like he was ridden hard and put away wet. He's got sunken eyes and is very thin. Could a lot of their marriage issues be over losing their son to the royals? I could see that causing a lot of fights.
As for Diana, I'm going to guess she had no opportunity to warn Harry. She may not even have been aware of what was going on with him. If she was under protection, I doubt anyone would have told her, knowing her first instinct would be to get in contact with him.
Yes, the official record has definitely been scrubbed to leave only what they want us to see. Even the conjecture we have could be smoke and mirrors put out to bamboozle and create counter-conspiracy narratives, just to tangle everyone up and enable smears and the usual playbook.
Looking back through the years of Harry, it seems there may even have been more than two. I remember in my minds eye a lot of pics of Harry when he was younger- skiing, parties, holidays etc. I'll have a dig around and see if I can find any first hand sauce- old attic newspapers and the like.
Just when you think things can't get any weirder, nice catch!
Same, I'll not be visiting the attic at this time of night. Did just find an interesting book whilst looking though (on another divert), the
Encyclopedia 1932 definition of vaccine:
''Lymph derived from vesicles on the udders of the cow. Besides Jenner's inoculation with calf's lymph for small-pox, however, vaccines (or preparations of the dead agent causing the disease) are used to counteract fevers, pneumonia etc.''
On Vaccination:
''...despite efforts of anti-vaccinators, legislation was carried out in 1898 to enforce vaccination on children: proof that this was prejudicial to health was necessary if the operation was to be avoided. The rules have since been less strictly enforced. The Act of 1907 allows a parent exemption of offspring if objection is made on conscientious grounds.''
I like books, too. That's why I can't lay my hands on the royalty books. I've completely filled my shelves up and some had to go in boxes. Heaven help anyone that saw my book collection without knowing me. I've got books on vampires, the occult, witchcraft, Freemasonry, Kabballah, along with Bible commentaries, "lost" books of the Bible, Dead Sea Scrolls, Sacred Geometry, history books from all of the places I've visited...you name it.
I read somewhere that any books written past like 1930-something are not to be trusted. You've probably got one of the last encyclopedias with actual truthful data. Funny how they were as worried about forced vaccinations back in 1898 as we are today. Some things never change.
I've got some books on the royals. I'll go take a looksee at them. They're not likely to be as scrubbed as online sources....at least I don't think MI5 has been in my house. Kek!
I found a series of photos of Harry throughout the years. Note that there are odd gaps in the progression of photos. There's one where he's with Diana at a waterpark when he should be 8, then it jumps ahead a couple years for the next photo.
I have to wonder, though, if we haven't been fed some disinformation on this. I've seen a couple of pics of Harry in his teens that just don't jive. Look at the 2001 photo. Note that it is a 3 year jump from the prior photo. The 2001 shot doesn't look like the current Harry at all. And, check this one out:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=images+of+prince+harry+when+he+was+younger&t=brave&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cheatsheet.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F12%2FPrince-Harry-640x378.png%3Fx57343
I can't get to the actual file at the moment, but I think he was 12?? in this photo.
"This is meant to be the father, he's had a rough old time by the looks of things, lots in the media about him"
Wow, he looks like he was ridden hard and put away wet. He's got sunken eyes and is very thin. Could a lot of their marriage issues be over losing their son to the royals? I could see that causing a lot of fights.
As for Diana, I'm going to guess she had no opportunity to warn Harry. She may not even have been aware of what was going on with him. If she was under protection, I doubt anyone would have told her, knowing her first instinct would be to get in contact with him.
Lots to ponder here!
Yes, the official record has definitely been scrubbed to leave only what they want us to see. Even the conjecture we have could be smoke and mirrors put out to bamboozle and create counter-conspiracy narratives, just to tangle everyone up and enable smears and the usual playbook.
Looking back through the years of Harry, it seems there may even have been more than two. I remember in my minds eye a lot of pics of Harry when he was younger- skiing, parties, holidays etc. I'll have a dig around and see if I can find any first hand sauce- old attic newspapers and the like.
Just when you think things can't get any weirder, nice catch!
I'll have to get back to you on the books. They're in a box somewhere and not on my bookshelves, sigh.
Same, I'll not be visiting the attic at this time of night. Did just find an interesting book whilst looking though (on another divert), the
Encyclopedia 1932 definition of vaccine:
''Lymph derived from vesicles on the udders of the cow. Besides Jenner's inoculation with calf's lymph for small-pox, however, vaccines (or preparations of the dead agent causing the disease) are used to counteract fevers, pneumonia etc.''
On Vaccination:
''...despite efforts of anti-vaccinators, legislation was carried out in 1898 to enforce vaccination on children: proof that this was prejudicial to health was necessary if the operation was to be avoided. The rules have since been less strictly enforced. The Act of 1907 allows a parent exemption of offspring if objection is made on conscientious grounds.''
I like books.
I like books, too. That's why I can't lay my hands on the royalty books. I've completely filled my shelves up and some had to go in boxes. Heaven help anyone that saw my book collection without knowing me. I've got books on vampires, the occult, witchcraft, Freemasonry, Kabballah, along with Bible commentaries, "lost" books of the Bible, Dead Sea Scrolls, Sacred Geometry, history books from all of the places I've visited...you name it.
I read somewhere that any books written past like 1930-something are not to be trusted. You've probably got one of the last encyclopedias with actual truthful data. Funny how they were as worried about forced vaccinations back in 1898 as we are today. Some things never change.
I've got some books on the royals. I'll go take a looksee at them. They're not likely to be as scrubbed as online sources....at least I don't think MI5 has been in my house. Kek!
Kek! If there's pages missing and black redaction lines in your book, I think we can probably all throw in the towel at that point.
Kek!