If you're arguing over the logic of a certain claim you have to make the same assumptions. In LaLa Land the vaccine provides immunity. The claim here is that it's illogical to be pushing 3rd and 4th shots and to be pushing 1st and 2nd shots at the same time. As I explained I don't think this makes any sense. Assuming the vaccine provides immunity it makes perfect sense to be pushing the shots the way they are. People who have no shots need their first and second, and people who've had their shots for a while need their 3rd and 4th. I mean, it's in the name: "booster shot". It boosts (allegedly) what's already there and has maybe become too weak over time to work on its own.

There's plenty of issues with the subscription service clot shot, but regardless of that, the logic pointed out by Zuby here isn't one of them.